Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Relation widget is not accepting a List as valueField #1052

Closed
prabu-ramaraj opened this issue Jan 26, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Relation widget is not accepting a List as valueField #1052

prabu-ramaraj opened this issue Jan 26, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@prabu-ramaraj
Copy link

prabu-ramaraj commented Jan 26, 2018

- Do you want to request a feature or report a bug?
Bug
- What is the current behavior?
Relation widget is not accepting a List field as valueField
- If the current behavior is a bug, please provide the steps to reproduce.
Say for example we have this setup as Relation field.
{label: "Features", name: "features", widget: "relation", collection: "pages", searchFields: ["title"], valueField: "features"}
Here the "features" valuefield is a List type
{label: Features, name: features, widget: list, default: ["super", "very super"]}
- What is the expected behavior?
It should add the values in the list to the current collection

- Please mention your CMS, node.js, and operating system version.

- Please link or paste your config.yml below if applicable.
https://github.com/prabu-ramaraj/one-click-hugo-cms/blob/master/site/static/admin/config.yml

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Oct 29, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the status: stale label Oct 29, 2019
@d4rekanguok
Copy link
Contributor

This feature is now supported in the latest version of NetlifyCMS! See #3754

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants