-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Repeatable migrations #123
Comments
Now that I have a working example of an enhanced table, I would like to get more input on how you envision this working. Currently, there is already an option to run a modified script if you're using DBOps packages, which store hashes internally and are able to distinct if a script on a filesystem is different from how it was imported into a build previously. I imagine that you're talking about achieving similar functionality in |
That's correct. In our setup we aren't quite able to utilize the full fledged CI/CD workflow currently, so we're just relying on the Comparing the hashes would make it a lot easier to have a View definition live in a single script, versus having to create a new migration script for it per change when using This may be a bit of an edge case, so thanks for looking into it! |
The more I look at it, the more I think that this functionality would benefit the module greatly, perhaps offering a third potential pipeline scenario that supports modified files. It seems, however, that it's not going to be a quick win. The only validation DbUp UpgradeEngine class does is script name validation, and the overrides might not be so easy to implement. But I'll give it an honest attempt at the very least. |
Being able to specify a script (via filename or special directory) that gets re-applied whenever the hash changes. It would be dependent on #120 getting done (adding file hashes), but IMO would bridge the feature parity gap between Flyway and Dbops for 99% of use cases.
Thanks again for a great tool! I'd be happy to help do some work towards this if needed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: