ci: improve caching #2329
ci: improve caching #2329
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications to multiple GitHub Actions workflows, primarily focusing on enhancing caching mechanisms for various build processes. The changes include replacing Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
shumkov
changed the title
# Conflicts: # .github/actions/docker/action.yaml # .github/workflows/release.yml # .github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (21)
.github/workflows/tests-codeql.yml (2)
33-40: Remove commented out S3 cache configuration.Since we're transitioning to GitHub Actions cache, this commented-out configuration can be safely removed to maintain code cleanliness.
AWS credentials configuration can be safely removed
Looking at the workflow file content and its dependencies:
- The AWS credentials were previously used for S3-based caching, which has been commented out and replaced with GitHub Actions cache
- The workflow doesn't use any other AWS services or features
- The
tests-codeql.ymlworkflow only performs CodeQL analysis using GitHub's actions🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
21-26: Verify if AWS credentials are still required.Since the caching mechanism has been moved from S3 to GitHub Actions cache, please verify if the AWS credentials configuration step is still necessary for other parts of the workflow.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if AWS credentials are used elsewhere in the workflow # Search for AWS-related actions or commands rg -l 'aws-' .github/workflows/tests-codeql.yml # Search for AWS service usage rg -i 's3|aws|amazon' .github/workflows/tests-codeql.ymlLength of output: 1217
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the entire workflow file content to understand AWS credentials usage cat .github/workflows/tests-codeql.yml # Also search for any AWS references in other workflow files rg -i 'aws|s3|amazon' .github/workflows/Length of output: 13090
.github/actions/librocksdb/action.yaml (2)
25-32: Remove commented out S3 caching implementationSince we're migrating to GitHub Actions cache, we should remove the commented out S3 implementation to maintain code cleanliness.
-# - name: Restore cached librocksdb from S3 -# id: librocksdb-cache -# uses: strophy/actions-cache@opendal-update -# with: -# bucket: ${{ inputs.bucket }} -# path: /opt/rocksdb -# key: librocksdb/${{ inputs.version }}/${{ runner.os }}/${{ runner.arch }}
Line range hint
8-11: Remove unused bucket input parameterSince we've migrated from S3 to GitHub Actions cache, the
bucketinput parameter is no longer needed.- bucket: - description: S3 bucket to use for caching - required: false - default: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c.github/workflows/tests-js-package.yml (1)
38-45: Remove commented out S3 cache configuration codeSince we're transitioning to GitHub Actions cache, we should remove the commented-out code. The Git history will preserve this information if needed in the future.
-# - name: Restore JS build artifacts -# uses: strophy/actions-cache@opendal-update -# with: -# bucket: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c -# root: actions-cache -# path: build-js-artifacts-${{ github.sha }}.tar -# key: build-js-artifacts/${{ github.sha }}Also applies to: 82-89
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml (1)
Remove AWS credentials configuration step
The AWS credentials configuration step should be removed as it's no longer needed:
- The workflow has migrated from S3-based caching to GitHub Actions cache (
actions/cache@v4)- All S3-related configurations are commented out (SCCACHE_BUCKET, SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIX)
- No other AWS services or actions are being used in the workflow
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
8-13: Verify if AWS credentials are still neededSince we're transitioning from S3 to GitHub Actions cache, verify if the AWS credentials configuration step is still necessary. If it's not used elsewhere in the workflow, it should be removed.
Let's check the actual usage of AWS credentials in these workflows to determine if they're still necessary.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for AWS-related usage in the workflow rg -l 'aws-access-key|AWS_ACCESS_KEY|aws-secret-access-key|AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY|aws-region|AWS_REGION' .github/workflows/Length of output: 567
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for actual AWS service usage in workflows rg -A 5 'aws-access-key|AWS_ACCESS_KEY|aws-secret-access-key|AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY' .github/workflows/tests-build-js.ymlLength of output: 451
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for S3 or other AWS service usage in the workflow rg -i 's3|aws-actions|aws/' .github/workflows/tests-build-js.ymlLength of output: 192
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any other AWS-related steps or actions in the workflow cat .github/workflows/tests-build-js.ymlLength of output: 3537
.github/actions/local-network/action.yaml (2)
Line range hint
104-110: Consider adding error handling for cache save failuresWhile the migration looks good, the cache save operation might fail silently. Consider adding error handling to notify when cache saves fail, as this could impact subsequent workflow runs.
- name: Save local network data uses: actions/cache/save@v4 + id: save-network-data with: path: | ${{ env.HOME }}/.dashmate **/.env dashmate_volumes_dump key: local-network-volumes/${{ steps.dashmate-fingerprint.outputs.sha }} if: steps.local-network-data.outputs.cache-hit != 'true' +- name: Check cache save status + if: steps.local-network-data.outputs.cache-hit != 'true' + shell: bash + run: | + if [[ "${{ steps.save-network-data.outcome }}" != "success" ]]; then + echo "::warning::Failed to save network data to cache" + fi
42-42: Consider implementing the TODO commentThe comment suggests using upload artifacts action instead of caching. This might be a valid architectural consideration since artifacts are more suitable for passing data between jobs, while caching is better for improving performance across workflow runs.
Would you like me to help implement this change using
actions/upload-artifactandactions/download-artifactactions?.github/actions/rust/action.yaml (3)
102-116: Remove commented-out S3 cache configuration.Since we're transitioning to GitHub Actions cache, this commented-out configuration should be removed to maintain code cleanliness. If needed, the history can be referenced through version control.
-# - name: Cache cargo registry (S3 bucket cache) -# uses: strophy/actions-cache@opendal-update -# if: inputs.cache == 'true' -# with: -# bucket: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c -# root: actions-cache -# path: | -# ${{ env.HOME }}/.cargo/registry/index -# ${{ env.HOME }}/.cargo/registry/cache -# ${{ env.HOME }}/.cargo/git -# key: ${{ runner.os }}/cargo/registry/${{ hashFiles('**/Cargo.lock') }} -# restore-keys: | -# ${{ runner.os }}/cargo/registry/${{ hashFiles('**/Cargo.lock') }} -# ${{ runner.os }}/cargo/registry/
Line range hint
89-91: Good use of complementary caching mechanisms!The combination of sccache for compilation artifacts and cargo registry caching for dependencies provides comprehensive caching coverage. The pinned sccache version matching the Dockerfile is a good practice.
Consider documenting the caching strategy in the repository's documentation to help other contributors understand:
- The role of sccache vs cargo registry cache
- When each cache is invalidated
- How to troubleshoot cache issues
⚠️ Potential cache configuration overlap detectedThe cache configuration in the Rust action looks good on its own, but there's an overlapping cache configuration in the Docker action that targets the same Cargo paths using
buildkit-cache-dance. This could lead to:
- Redundant caching of the same artifacts
- Potential race conditions or inconsistencies between the two caching mechanisms
Suggested actions:
- Either consolidate the caching strategy to use a single mechanism
- Or ensure the two actions are never used in the same workflow to prevent conflicts
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
117-129: The cache configuration looks good!The transition to
actions/cache@v4is well-implemented with:
- Appropriate cache paths for Cargo registry
- Good cache key strategy using OS and Cargo.lock
- Proper fallback with restore-keys
Let's verify the cache effectiveness:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other Cargo-related caching in the repository # to ensure we're not duplicating cache configurations # Look for other cargo cache configurations echo "Checking for other cargo cache configurations..." rg -l 'cargo/registry|\.cargo/git' .github/Length of output: 220
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's check the content of the docker action to see if there's any duplicate caching echo "Content of docker action cargo caching:" rg -A 5 -B 5 'cargo/registry|\.cargo/git' .github/actions/docker/action.yamlLength of output: 809
.github/workflows/tests-dashmate.yml (2)
44-57: LGTM! Consider cleaning up commented code.The transition from S3 to GitHub Actions cache is implemented correctly. The
fail-on-cache-missparameter ensures the workflow fails fast if artifacts are missing, which is appropriate since these are required for the workflow to function.Consider removing the commented-out S3 cache configuration (lines 44-51) since we're committing to GitHub Actions cache. If needed, this history will be preserved in git.
97-117: LGTM! Clean up commented configuration.The transition of local network data caching to GitHub Actions cache is implemented correctly, maintaining the same paths and conditional logic.
Remove the commented-out S3 configuration (lines 97-108) and the commented S3 parameters (lines 113-114) to keep the workflow file clean.
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml (2)
Line range hint
19-33: Remove unused AWS-related inputsSince we're transitioning from S3 to GitHub Actions cache, the following inputs are no longer needed and should be removed:
- bucket
- region
- aws_access_key_id
- aws_secret_access_key
S3 dependencies still present in action inputs and workflow files
The action still contains S3-related input parameters and commented-out S3 configurations that should be removed since the migration to GitHub Actions cache is complete:
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml:
- Remove unused input parameters:
bucket,region,aws_access_key_id,aws_secret_access_key- Clean up commented-out S3 configurations (lines with
SCCACHE_BUCKET,SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIX,AWS_*)🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-189: Verify complete removal of S3 dependenciesLet's ensure all S3-related configurations have been properly migrated to GitHub Actions cache.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining S3-related configurations in GitHub Actions # Search for S3-related terms in GitHub Actions files echo "Checking for remaining S3 configurations in GitHub Actions files..." rg -i 's3|aws|bucket' .github/Length of output: 16044
.github/workflows/release.yml (3)
43-58: Remove commented out code and approve cache configuration.The switch to
actions/cache/restore@v4is appropriate for the PR's objective. Thefail-on-cache-missparameter is correctly set to ensure the job fails if required artifacts are missing.Remove the commented-out configuration (lines 43-51) as it's no longer needed and clutters the workflow file.
100-103: Clean up S3-related environment variables.The addition of
SCCACHE_GHA_ENABLEDis correct for enabling GitHub Actions cache support in sccache.Remove the commented-out S3-related environment variables as they're no longer needed.
255-269: Remove commented out code and approve cache configuration.The cache configuration is consistent with the earlier change in the workflow, correctly using
actions/cache/restore@v4with appropriate parameters.Remove the commented-out configuration (lines 255-262) to maintain a clean workflow file.
.github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml (3)
48-54: Consider cleaning up commented S3 configurationThe transition from S3 to GitHub Actions cache is implemented consistently across all jobs. However, the commented-out S3 configuration (
SCCACHE_BUCKET,SCCACHE_REGION,SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIX) is retained in multiple places. This creates unnecessary noise in the workflow file.Consider either:
- Removing the commented configuration if the transition is permanent
- Adding a comment explaining why it's kept (e.g., for fallback purposes)
-# SCCACHE_BUCKET: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c -# SCCACHE_REGION: ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }} -# SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIX: ${{ runner.os }}/sccache/${{ runner.arch }}/linux-gnuAlso applies to: 60-63, 84-90, 94-97, 130-136, 141-144, 234-240, 245-248, 281-287, 291-294
Line range hint
29-34: Remove unused AWS credentials configurationSince the caching mechanism has been moved to GitHub Actions, the AWS credentials configuration step appears to be unnecessary for the lint job unless it's required for other purposes.
If AWS credentials are not needed for other purposes in this job, consider removing the following configuration:
- - name: Configure AWS credentials and bucket region - uses: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v4 - with: - aws-access-key-id: ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID }} - aws-secret-access-key: ${{ secrets.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY }} - aws-region: ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }}
Line range hint
1-294: Consider optimizing workflow structureThe workflow contains repeated configuration blocks for sccache across multiple jobs. This could be optimized to reduce maintenance overhead and improve readability.
Consider these improvements:
- Create a reusable composite action for sccache configuration
- Move common environment variables to the workflow level
- Create a reusable job template for similar jobs
Example composite action:
# .github/actions/setup-sccache/action.yml name: 'Setup sccache' description: 'Configures sccache for GitHub Actions cache' runs: using: "composite" steps: - uses: actions/github-script@v7 with: script: | core.exportVariable('ACTIONS_CACHE_URL', process.env.ACTIONS_CACHE_URL || ''); core.exportVariable('ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN', process.env.ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN || '');
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml(2 hunks).github/actions/librocksdb/action.yaml(1 hunks).github/actions/local-network/action.yaml(3 hunks).github/actions/nodejs/action.yaml(1 hunks).github/actions/rust/action.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/release.yml(4 hunks).github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml(3 hunks).github/workflows/tests-codeql.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/tests-dashmate.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests-js-package.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
.github/actions/nodejs/action.yaml (1)
Line range hint 31-37: LGTM! Clean implementation of GitHub Actions cache.
The implementation correctly:
- Uses the latest
actions/cache@v4 - Maintains the same cache paths and key structure
- Aligns with the PR objective of switching from S3 to GitHub Actions cache
.github/workflows/tests-codeql.yml (1)
41-46: LGTM! Cache configuration looks good.
The transition to actions/cache/restore@v4 is implemented correctly with appropriate parameters. The fail-on-cache-miss: 'true' ensures the workflow fails early if the build artifacts are missing, which is a good practice.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify cache key consistency across workflows
# Check if the cache key pattern is consistent across other workflow files
rg 'key: build-js-artifacts/\$\{\{ github.sha \}\}' .github/workflows/.github/actions/librocksdb/action.yaml (1)
39-39: Verify cache-hit output variable compatibility
Let's verify that steps.librocksdb-cache.outputs.cache-hit is the correct output variable for actions/cache@v4.
✅ Verification successful
Cache output variable is correctly used
The verification shows that steps.librocksdb-cache.outputs.cache-hit is the correct output variable:
- Multiple workflows in the repository consistently use the same
cache-hitoutput pattern withactions/cache@v4 - The pattern is used across different workflow files (.github/workflows/) and actions (.github/actions/)
- All cache step conditions follow the same format:
steps.<step-id>.outputs.cache-hit
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check actions/cache@v4 documentation for correct output variables
# Fetch the latest actions/cache documentation
gh api repos/actions/cache/contents/README.md | jq -r '.content' | base64 -d | grep -A 5 "### Outputs"
Length of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try searching for cache-hit usage patterns in GitHub Actions workflows
rg -U "cache-hit.*'true'" .github/
Length of output: 2768
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any cache step ID references
rg "id:\s*.*cache" .github/
Length of output: 429
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for cache action usage patterns
rg "uses:\s*actions/cache@" .github/
Length of output: 496
.github/workflows/tests-js-package.yml (2)
47-51: LGTM! Cache configuration looks good
The new GitHub Actions cache configuration is well structured:
- Uses the latest v4 of actions/cache
- Appropriate use of
fail-on-cache-misssince build artifacts are required - Good cache key strategy using the commit SHA
Also applies to: 91-95
Line range hint 28-32: Verify if AWS credentials are still needed
Since we're transitioning from S3 to GitHub Actions cache, we should verify if the AWS credentials configuration is still necessary for other purposes in this workflow.
Also applies to: 68-72
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results. The search shows that AWS credentials are still actively used in several workflows for purposes beyond S3:
- In
tests-test-suite.ymlandtests-packges-functional.yml, AWS credentials are used for ECR (Elastic Container Registry) login:
- name: Login to ECR
run: aws ecr get-login-password --region ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }} | docker login --username AWS --password-stdin ${{ env.ECR_HOST }}- In
tests-build-image.yml, AWS credentials are used for ECR authentication:
- name: Login to ECR
run: aws ecr get-login-password --region ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }} | docker login --username AWS --password-stdin ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCOUNT_ID }}.dkr.ecr.${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }}.amazonaws.comAWS credentials configuration is still required
The AWS credentials are necessary for Docker image operations with Amazon ECR, even though we're moving away from S3 to GitHub Actions cache. The credentials are used for authenticating with ECR to pull/push Docker images.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for AWS-related usage in the workflow files
echo "Searching for AWS usage in workflow files..."
rg -l 'aws-' .github/workflows/ | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
# Show AWS-related content with context
rg -A 5 -B 5 'aws-' "$file"
done
Length of output: 9919
.github/actions/local-network/action.yaml (1)
Line range hint 56-64: LGTM! Clean migration of restore logic
The migration from S3 to GitHub Actions cache maintains the same paths and keys while removing S3-specific configuration. The conditional logic for volume restoration remains intact.
.github/workflows/tests-dashmate.yml (2)
Line range hint 1-140: Verify complete migration from S3 cache.
To ensure a complete migration, we should verify that no other parts of the codebase still reference the S3-based caching solution.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for remaining references to the S3 cache action
rg -l 'strophy/actions-cache' .github/workflows/
# Search for references to the S3 bucket
rg -l 'multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c' .github/workflows/🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
95-95: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
Line range hint 28-33: Verify if AWS credentials are still required.
Since we're moving away from S3 to GitHub Actions cache, verify if the AWS credentials configuration step is still necessary. It might only be needed for ECR access.
✅ Verification successful
AWS credentials are required for ECR access
The AWS credentials configuration is still necessary as it's being used to access Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR):
- The workflow uses AWS credentials to authenticate with ECR (
aws ecr get-login-password) - Docker images are pulled from and pushed to ECR (
${AWS_ACCOUNT_ID}.dkr.ecr.${AWS_REGION}.amazonaws.com) - Multiple container images are managed: drive, dapi, and dashmate-helper
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for AWS credential usage in the workflow
rg -l 'aws-access-key-id|AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID' .github/workflows/
# Then check each file for AWS service usage beyond S3
rg -A 5 'aws ' .github/workflows/tests-dashmate.yml
Length of output: 603
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for AWS credential configuration and usage in the workflow
cat .github/workflows/tests-dashmate.yml
Length of output: 5248
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml (2)
89-154: Well-structured cache configuration
The implementation of both Cargo and Yarn caching is well-designed:
- Uses the latest actions/cache@v4
- Properly structured cache keys with fallback restore-keys
- Correct integration with buildkit-cache-dance
- Appropriate environment variable export for GitHub Actions cache
158-172: Well-implemented GitHub Actions cache integration
The Docker build configuration has been properly updated:
- Correctly configured sccache with GitHub Actions cache
- Appropriate cache-from/to configuration using type=gha
- Well-structured build arguments
Also applies to: 181-183
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)
80-86: LGTM: Proper sccache configuration for GitHub Actions cache.
The configuration correctly exports the necessary environment variables for sccache to work with GitHub Actions cache.
.github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml (2)
84-97: LGTM! Clean implementation of GitHub Actions cache
The formatting job's configuration is well-structured and correctly implements the new caching strategy without unnecessary AWS credentials configuration.
52-53: Verify security implications of token exports
While the token export is using existing environment variables, it's important to ensure that:
- These tokens are not logged or exposed in job outputs
- The scope of token usage is limited to the caching functionality
Run the following script to check for potential token exposure in workflow logs:
✅ Verification successful
Token exports are properly scoped and secure
The token exports are secure because:
- The
set -exusage is in a different job and not where tokens are handled - The tokens are only exported for sccache configuration and used by subsequent steps with proper environment isolation
- There's no direct logging or exposure of these tokens in any workflow steps
- The tokens are properly scoped with
id-token: writepermissions where needed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential token exposure patterns in the workflow
# Check for debug or set -x usage that might expose tokens
rg "set -x|set -ex" .github/workflows/
# Check for echo or logging of environment variables
rg "echo.*\$ACTIONS_" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 193
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the workflow files more comprehensively
# Check the context where set -x is used and if it's in the same job where tokens are exported
rg -B 5 -A 5 "set -[e]?x" .github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml
# Check how these environment variables are used in the workflow
rg -B 5 -A 5 "ACTIONS_CACHE_URL|ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN" .github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml
# Check for any direct token usage or exposure
rg "token|TOKEN" .github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml
Length of output: 3493
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
.github/workflows/tests-codeql.yml (1)
33-40: Remove commented-out codeSince the migration to GitHub Actions cache is complete, we should remove this commented-out section to maintain code cleanliness.
-# - name: Restore JS build artifacts archive -# uses: strophy/actions-cache@opendal-update -# with: -# bucket: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c -# root: actions-cache -# path: build-js-artifacts-${{ github.sha }}.tar -# key: build-js-artifacts/${{ github.sha }}.github/workflows/release.yml (4)
43-58: Remove commented out S3 cache configuration.The transition to GitHub Actions cache looks good. However, the commented-out S3 configuration should be removed since we're committing to the new caching system.
-# - name: Retrieve JS build artifacts -# uses: strophy/actions-cache@opendal-update -# id: cache -# with: -# bucket: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c -# root: actions-cache -# path: build-js-artifacts-${{ github.sha }}.tar -# key: build-js-artifacts/${{ github.sha }}
100-103: Remove commented out S3-specific environment variables.The addition of
SCCACHE_GHA_ENABLEDis correct for GitHub Actions cache. The S3-specific environment variables should be removed since they're no longer needed.SCCACHE_GHA_ENABLED: true -# SCCACHE_BUCKET: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c -# SCCACHE_REGION: ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }} -# SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIX: ${{ runner.os }}/sccache/wasm/wasm32
255-269: Remove commented out S3 cache configuration in dashmate packages job.The GitHub Actions cache configuration is correct, but the commented-out S3 configuration should be removed for consistency.
-# - name: Retrieve JS build artifacts -# uses: strophy/actions-cache@opendal-update -# with: -# bucket: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c -# root: actions-cache -# path: build-js-artifacts-${{ github.sha }}.tar -# key: build-js-artifacts/${{ github.sha }}
Migration from S3 to GitHub Actions cache is incomplete
Several workflow files still contain references to S3 caching:
tests-rs-package.yml: Contains SCCACHE_BUCKET and SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIX configurationstests-js-package.yml: Uses strophy/actions-cache with S3 buckettests-dashmate.yml: Uses strophy/actions-cache with S3 buckettests-codeql.yml: Uses strophy/actions-cache with S3 buckettests-build-js.yml: Contains both SCCACHE and strophy/actions-cache S3 configurationstests-test-suite.yml,tests-packges-functional.yml,tests-build-image.yml,release-docker-image.yml: Still have AWS bucket configuration🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-377: Verify complete migration from S3 to GitHub Actions cache.The workflow changes look good overall, but let's verify we haven't missed any S3 cache references.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining S3 cache references in workflow files # Look for S3-specific terms in workflow files echo "Checking for remaining S3 cache references..." rg -i "s3|bucket|strophy/actions-cache" .github/workflows/Length of output: 4609
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/release.yml(4 hunks).github/workflows/tests-codeql.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/tests-js-package.yml(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/tests-js-package.yml
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/tests-codeql.yml (1)
42-46: LGTM! Good security improvement
The switch to GitHub Actions cache is a positive change that:
- Reduces attack surface by eliminating S3 dependency
- Simplifies configuration
- Properly fails on cache miss
Let's verify the cache key format consistency across workflows:
✅ Verification successful
Cache key format inconsistency detected in workflows
The search results show that there are two different cache key formats being used across workflows:
- Old format with forward slash:
build-js-artifacts/${{ github.sha }} - New format with hyphen:
build-js-artifacts-${{ github.sha }}
Let's verify if these are commented out vs active configurations:
Cache key format is consistent across all active configurations
The verification shows that:
- All active cache configurations use the new hyphenated format
build-js-artifacts-${{ github.sha }} - The old format with forward slash only appears in commented-out code, likely kept for reference during migration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check cache key format consistency across workflows
# Expect: All cache keys for JS artifacts should follow the same format
# Search for cache key patterns in workflow files
echo "Checking cache key patterns in workflows:"
rg -A 1 'key:.*build-js-artifacts' .github/workflows/
Length of output: 2216
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for active (non-commented) cache key configurations
echo "Active cache key configurations:"
rg -N '^[^#].*key:.*build-js-artifacts' .github/workflows/
echo -e "\nCommented out cache key configurations:"
rg -N '^#.*key:.*build-js-artifacts' .github/workflows/
Length of output: 1517
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)
80-86: LGTM: Proper sccache configuration for GitHub Actions.
The configuration correctly exports the necessary environment variables for sccache to work with GitHub Actions cache, including proper handling of undefined variables.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml (1)
44-61: Optimize workflow structure and git checkoutConsider these improvements:
- Move the condition to the job level to reduce repetition
- Use shallow clone unless full history is needed
jobs: build-js: name: Build JS runs-on: ubuntu-24.04 + if: ${{ needs.check-artifacts.outputs.exists != 'true' }} steps: - name: Check out repo uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: - fetch-depth: 0 + fetch-depth: 1 - if: ${{ steps.exists.outputs.result != 'true' }} - name: Login to DockerHub uses: docker/login-action@v3 with: username: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_USERNAME }} password: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_TOKEN }} - if: ${{ steps.exists.outputs.result != 'true' }}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
.github/workflows/tests-codeql.yml (1)
Line range hint
19-24: Remove unnecessary AWS credentials configurationSince the workflow is being migrated from S3 to GitHub Actions artifacts, the AWS credentials configuration step is no longer needed and should be removed.
- - name: Configure AWS credentials and bucket region - uses: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v4 - with: - aws-access-key-id: ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID }} - aws-secret-access-key: ${{ secrets.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY }} - aws-region: ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }}.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml (3)
Line range hint
1-14: Remove unnecessary AWS credentials configurationSince we're transitioning from S3 to GitHub Actions cache, the AWS credentials configuration step is no longer needed.
- - name: Configure AWS credentials and bucket region - uses: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v4 - with: - aws-access-key-id: ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID }} - aws-secret-access-key: ${{ secrets.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY }} - aws-region: ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }}🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:2:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
16-19: Use a stable version for the artifact existence checkThe action is currently pinned to v0 which is considered unstable. Consider using a stable version or SHA for better reliability.
- - uses: softwareforgood/check-artifact-v4-existence@v0 + - uses: softwareforgood/check-artifact-v4-existence@v1
Line range hint
1-99: Consider streamlining the caching strategyThe current implementation mixes different caching approaches:
- GitHub Actions artifact storage for build outputs
- GitHub Actions cache for sccache
- Remnants of S3 configuration
Consider consolidating these into a more cohesive caching strategy:
- Use GitHub Actions cache for all Rust/WASM compilation artifacts via sccache
- Use GitHub Actions artifacts only for final build outputs
- Remove all S3-related configurations
- Consider implementing a composite action to encapsulate the caching logic for reuse across workflows
This would make the workflow more maintainable and easier to understand.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:2:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
.github/actions/local-network/action.yaml (2)
33-44: Remove commented out codeThe commented out code for the old S3-based cache implementation should be removed to improve maintainability. If needed, this code can be referenced from the git history.
- # TODO: Use upload artifacts action instead -# - name: Restore local network data -# id: local-network-data -# uses: strophy/actions-cache/restore@opendal-update -# with: -# bucket: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c -# root: local-network-data -# path: | -# ${{ env.HOME }}/.dashmate -# **/.env -# dashmate_volumes_dump -# key: local-network-volumes/${{ steps.dashmate-fingerprint.outputs.sha }}
81-92: Remove commented out codeSimilar to the previous comment, remove the commented out code for the old S3-based cache save implementation.
-# - name: Save local network data -# uses: strophy/actions-cache/save@opendal-update -# with: -# bucket: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c -# root: local-network-data -# path: | -# ${{ env.HOME }}/.dashmate -# **/.env -# dashmate_volumes_dump -# key: local-network-volumes/${{ steps.dashmate-fingerprint.outputs.sha }} -# if: steps.local-network-data.outputs.cache-hit != 'true'.github/workflows/tests-dashmate.yml (1)
98-104: Clean up unnecessary commented parametersThe cache configuration is correctly implemented using
actions/cache@v4. However, the commented S3-specific parameters (bucketandroot) should be removed as they're not relevant to the GitHub Actions cache.- name: Use test suite local network data to speed up dashmate local network tests id: local-network-data uses: actions/cache@v4 with: -# bucket: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c -# root: local-network-data path: | ${{ env.HOME }}/.dashmate dashmate_volumes_dump key: local-network-volumes/${{ steps.dashmate-fingerprint.outputs.sha }}.github/workflows/tests.yml (1)
246-249: Consider adding error handling for artifact deletionThe artifact deletion step might fail if:
- Artifacts were never created
- Previous deletion attempts occurred
- GitHub API issues arise
Consider adding error handling:
- uses: geekyeggo/delete-artifact@v5 with: name: build-js-artifacts-${{ github.sha }} + failOnError: false if: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' || github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' || github.event_name == 'schedule' || !github.event.pull_request.draft }}.github/workflows/release.yml (2)
85-89: Remove commented S3 configurationSince we're transitioning to GitHub Actions cache, the commented S3 configuration should be removed rather than left as comments.
-# SCCACHE_BUCKET: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c -# SCCACHE_REGION: ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }} -# SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIX: ${{ runner.os }}/sccache/wasm/wasm32
Line range hint
1-324: Well-structured transition from S3 to GitHub Actions cacheThe implementation successfully transitions from S3 to GitHub Actions cache while maintaining proper build artifact handling. The workflow maintains good separation of concerns between build, cache, and release stages.
Some architectural considerations:
- The caching strategy is more maintainable as it uses GitHub's native features
- The artifact handling includes proper error checking and retention policies
- The workflow maintains backward compatibility while removing S3 dependencies
Consider implementing a cleanup job to ensure artifacts are properly cleaned up even if the workflow fails.
.github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml (1)
40-45: Consider adding cache fallback mechanismWhile the migration to GitHub Actions cache is good, consider implementing a fallback mechanism in case the GitHub Actions cache fails or is unavailable. This could involve:
- Keeping S3 as a secondary cache
- Adding cache versioning
- Implementing cache warming strategies
Example implementation:
env: SCCACHE_GHA_ENABLED: true # Fallback to S3 if GitHub Actions cache fails SCCACHE_FALLBACK: s3 SCCACHE_BUCKET: ${{ vars.CACHE_BUCKET }} SCCACHE_REGION: ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }} # Add cache versioning SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIX: v1/${{ runner.os }}/sccache/${{ runner.arch }}/linux-gnuAlso applies to: 52-55, 76-81, 86-89, 122-127, 133-136, 226-231, 237-240, 274-279, 284-287
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
.github/actions/local-network/action.yaml(3 hunks).github/workflows/release.yml(3 hunks).github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests-codeql.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/tests-dashmate.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests-js-package.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml(7 hunks).github/workflows/tests.yml(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/tests-js-package.yml
🔇 Additional comments (14)
.github/workflows/tests-codeql.yml (1)
33-36: LGTM! Successful migration to GitHub Actions artifacts
The change from S3 to GitHub Actions artifacts is implemented correctly:
- Uses the official
actions/download-artifact@v4action - Includes SHA in artifact name for uniqueness
- Maintains compatibility with the subsequent unpack step
.github/actions/local-network/action.yaml (3)
14-17: Ensure coordinated artifact name updates across workflows
The artifact name format has changed from build-js-artifacts/${{ github.sha }} to build-js-artifacts-${{ github.sha }}. This change requires coordinated updates across all workflows that produce or consume these artifacts.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for workflows still using the old artifact name format
rg 'name: build-js-artifacts/\$\{\{ github.sha \}\}' .github/workflows/Line range hint 46-52: LGTM! Clean implementation using GitHub's official cache action
The transition to actions/cache/restore@v4 is well implemented, maintaining the same functionality while removing S3-specific complexity.
Line range hint 93-101: LGTM! Clean implementation using GitHub's official cache action
The transition to actions/cache/save@v4 is well implemented, maintaining the same functionality while removing S3-specific complexity. The conditional save on cache miss is correctly preserved.
.github/workflows/tests-dashmate.yml (1)
44-47: LGTM: Appropriate use of GitHub's artifact download action
The transition from S3-based caching to GitHub's native artifact system is well implemented. Using actions/download-artifact@v4 with the commit SHA in the artifact name ensures proper artifact versioning and isolation.
.github/workflows/tests.yml (2)
175-175: LGTM: Proper job dependency added
Adding build-js as a dependency ensures that JavaScript packages are built before running E2E tests, which is the correct order of operations.
234-242: LGTM: Well-structured artifact cleanup job
The job is properly configured to:
- Run after all jobs that consume JS build artifacts
- Execute even if dependent jobs are skipped (
always()) - Target specific artifacts using the commit SHA
.github/workflows/release.yml (4)
64-70: LGTM: Clean transition from S3 to GitHub Actions cache
The sccache configuration correctly switches from S3 to GitHub Actions cache by exporting the necessary environment variables.
148-155: LGTM: Robust artifact handling implementation
The artifact upload configuration is well-implemented with:
- Proper error handling with
if-no-files-found: error - Appropriate retention period
- Correct conditional execution
249-252: LGTM: Consistent artifact handling
The artifact download configuration correctly matches the upload configuration, ensuring proper artifact flow between jobs.
43-46: Verify the reliability of the third-party action
The softwareforgood/check-artifact-v4-existence@v0 action is relatively new. Consider using the official actions/cache@v4 with cache key validation instead.
.github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml (3)
Line range hint 1-11: LGTM! Workflow inputs simplified
The removal of dynamic runner inputs in favor of a static runner configuration simplifies the workflow without losing functionality.
16-16: LGTM! Standardized runner configuration
Standardizing on ubuntu-24.04 across all jobs improves workflow consistency and maintainability.
Also applies to: 207-207, 248-248
40-45: LGTM! Successfully migrated to GitHub Actions cache
The migration from S3 to GitHub Actions cache is implemented correctly with proper environment variable configuration.
Also applies to: 52-55
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml (2)
16-19: Consider using a more maintainable artifact naming strategyThe current artifact naming strategy using SHA (
js-build-${{ github.sha }}) could lead to storage management issues over time. Consider using a more sustainable naming scheme based on branch name or build type.- name: js-build-${{ github.sha }} + name: js-build-${{ github.ref_name }}
89-96: Consider adding artifact compression and validationWhile the artifact upload is functional, consider adding compression and validation steps to ensure reliable builds:
- The artifacts could be compressed before upload to save space
- A validation step could verify the integrity of the uploaded files
+ - name: Compress build artifacts + run: tar czf build-artifacts.tar.gz ${{ steps.diff.outputs.files }} + if: ${{ steps.check-artifact.outputs.exists != 'true' }} + - name: Upload the archive of built files uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: name: js-build-${{ github.sha }} - path: ${{ steps.diff.outputs.files }} + path: build-artifacts.tar.gz retention-days: 1 if-no-files-found: error + compression-level: 0 # Already compressed if: ${{ steps.check-artifact.outputs.exists != 'true' }} + + - name: Validate uploaded artifact + run: | + gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \ + /repos/${{ github.repository }}/actions/artifacts \ + --jq ".artifacts[] | select(.name == \"js-build-${{ github.sha }}\")" \ + || echo "::error::Artifact validation failed" + if: ${{ steps.check-artifact.outputs.exists != 'true' }}.github/workflows/release.yml (4)
43-46: Consider pinning to a specific version hash.The artifact checking implementation looks good, but for better reproducibility and security, consider pinning to a specific commit hash instead of using
@v0.- - uses: softwareforgood/check-artifact-v4-existence@v0 + - uses: softwareforgood/check-artifact-v4-existence@5c2c22cb66f7fb198f5f88b9d4c01c1a11a9a7d8
85-89: Remove commented S3-related environment variables.Since we're transitioning to GitHub Actions cache, the commented S3-related environment variables should be removed rather than left in the file.
env: CARGO_BUILD_PROFILE: release RUSTC_WRAPPER: sccache SCCACHE_GHA_ENABLED: true -# SCCACHE_BUCKET: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c -# SCCACHE_REGION: ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }} -# SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIX: ${{ runner.os }}/sccache/wasm/wasm32
145-155: Consider using a more robust archive creation approach.The artifact handling looks good overall, but the archive creation could be improved to handle potential errors with empty input.
- run: xargs -a artifacts_list.txt tar cvf js-build-${{ github.sha }}.tar + run: | + if [ -s artifacts_list.txt ]; then + xargs -a artifacts_list.txt tar cvf js-build-${{ github.sha }}.tar + else + echo "No files to archive" + exit 1 + fi
Line range hint
1-324: Well-structured transition from S3 to GitHub Actions cache.The migration from S3 to GitHub Actions cache has been implemented effectively. The workflow maintains proper separation of concerns and handles artifacts appropriately. The integration with sccache is well done, providing efficient caching for Rust builds.
A few architectural considerations:
- The workflow properly handles concurrent runs with the
concurrencygroup- The conditional execution based on artifact existence prevents unnecessary rebuilds
- The error handling is robust across all steps
Consider implementing a cleanup job to remove artifacts after they're no longer needed, as GitHub Actions has storage limits. This could be triggered by workflow_run events.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.github/actions/local-network/action.yaml(3 hunks).github/workflows/release.yml(3 hunks).github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests-codeql.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/tests-dashmate.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests-js-package.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests.yml(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- .github/actions/local-network/action.yaml
- .github/workflows/tests-codeql.yml
- .github/workflows/tests-js-package.yml
- .github/workflows/tests.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml
84-84: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:24: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml (3)
25-25: LGTM: Consistent conditional execution pattern
The conditional steps are well-structured and follow a consistent pattern for skipping redundant builds.
Also applies to: 32-32, 36-36, 42-42
44-50: Reiterating previous review: Improve error handling
Referring to the previous review comment about improving error handling in sccache configuration.
64-67: Reiterating previous review: Remove S3 configuration
Referring to the previous review comment about removing commented S3 configuration.
.github/workflows/tests-dashmate.yml (1)
44-47: LGTM: Artifact download step correctly updated
The transition to actions/download-artifact@v4 is appropriate and follows best practices with proper artifact naming using commit SHA.
.github/workflows/release.yml (2)
64-70: LGTM! Proper configuration of sccache with GitHub Actions cache.
The configuration correctly exports the necessary environment variables for GitHub Actions cache integration.
249-252: LGTM! Proper artifact download configuration.
The artifact download step is correctly configured and consistent with the upload step.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml (3)
16-19: Consider using official GitHub Actions for artifact handlingInstead of using a third-party action for checking artifact existence, consider using the official
actions/download-artifact@v4which has built-in support for checking artifact existence through its outputs.- - uses: softwareforgood/check-artifact-v4-existence@v0 - id: check-artifact - with: - name: js-build-${{ github.sha }} + - uses: actions/download-artifact@v4 + id: check-artifact + with: + name: js-build-${{ github.sha }} + path: . + continue-on-error: true
89-96: Review artifact retention and error handling strategyThe current implementation has two potential issues:
- The 1-day retention period might be too short if the artifacts are needed for downstream workflows or debugging
- The error handling could be improved by adding explicit conditions
Consider these improvements:
- name: Upload the archive of built files uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: name: js-build-${{ github.sha }} path: ${{ steps.diff.outputs.files }} - retention-days: 1 + retention-days: 7 if-no-files-found: error - if: ${{ steps.check-artifact.outputs.exists != 'true' }} + if: ${{ steps.check-artifact.outputs.exists != 'true' && steps.diff.outputs.files != '' }}
Line range hint
25-96: Optimize workflow structure to reduce redundancyThe workflow has multiple steps with the same condition
if: ${{ steps.check-artifact.outputs.exists != 'true' }}. This could be simplified by moving the condition to the job level or using a composite action.Consider either:
- Using job-level conditions:
jobs: build-js: name: Build JS runs-on: ubuntu-24.04 steps: - name: Check artifact id: check-artifact uses: actions/download-artifact@v4 with: name: js-build-${{ github.sha }} path: . continue-on-error: true build-js-if-needed: name: Build JS if needed needs: build-js if: needs.build-js.outputs.exists != 'true' runs-on: ubuntu-24.04 steps: # All build steps without individual conditions
- Or creating a composite action to encapsulate the build logic
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:2:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml
84-84: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:24: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml (3)
90-97: Enhance artifact upload reliabilityThe current implementation relies on git command output for determining paths, which could miss important files or include unnecessary ones.
Consider using explicit path patterns for better control:
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: name: js-build path: | packages/**/dist/** packages/**/build/** !**/*.test.* retention-days: 1 if-no-files-found: error
Line range hint
8-13: Remove unnecessary AWS configurationSince we're transitioning from S3 to GitHub Actions cache, the AWS credentials configuration step is no longer needed.
Remove the entire
Configure AWS credentials and bucket regionstep as it's not required for GitHub Actions cache.🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:2:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
Line range hint
25-88: Simplify workflow by moving conditions to job levelMultiple steps have the same condition
if: ${{ steps.check-artifact.outputs.exists != 'true' }}. This creates unnecessary repetition and makes the workflow harder to maintain.Consider restructuring the workflow to use job-level conditions:
jobs: build-js: name: Build JS runs-on: ubuntu-24.04 steps: - uses: softwareforgood/check-artifact-v4-existence@v0 id: check-artifact with: name: js-build - name: Build JS if: ${{ steps.check-artifact.outputs.exists != 'true' }} steps: # Move all build steps here without individual conditions🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:2:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml
84-84: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:1:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
84-84: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
84-84: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:45: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
84-84: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:15: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml (2)
90-98: Consider optimizing artifact upload configurationWhile the implementation is functional, consider these improvements:
- Use a more maintainable naming scheme without SHA to prevent artifact proliferation
- Review if 1-day retention is sufficient for your CI/CD needs
- Consider using explicit path patterns instead of dynamic output from git command
- name: Upload the archive of built files uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4 with: - name: js-build-${{ github.sha }} - path: ${{ steps.diff.outputs.files }} + name: js-build + path: | + **/* + !.yarn/** + !target/** + !node_modules/** + !.nyc_output/** + !.idea/** + !.ultra.exists.json + !db/** retention-days: 1 if-no-files-found: error include-hidden-files: true
Line range hint
1-98: Overall implementation successfully transitions to GitHub Actions cacheThe workflow successfully moves away from S3 to GitHub Actions cache, aligning with the PR objectives. While the implementation is functional, consider addressing the existing review comments to:
- Use official GitHub Actions instead of third-party actions
- Improve error handling in sccache configuration
- Remove commented S3 configuration
- Simplify the artifact upload process
- Improve shell script reliability
- Optimize artifact naming and retention strategy
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
71-71: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:2:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
.github/workflows/release.yml (2)
64-89: Remove commented out S3 configurationThe switch to GitHub Actions cache is implemented correctly. However, the commented-out S3 configuration should be removed since it's no longer needed:
-# SCCACHE_BUCKET: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c -# SCCACHE_REGION: ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }} -# SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIX: ${{ runner.os }}/sccache/wasm/wasm32
137-155: Consider optimizing artifact handlingThe artifact creation and upload implementation is functional but could be improved:
- The two-step process could be simplified:
- - name: Get modified files - id: diff - run: git ls-files --others --exclude-standard >> artifacts_list.txt - - - name: Create an archive of built files - run: xargs -a artifacts_list.txt tar cvf js-build-${{ github.sha }}.tar + - name: Create archive of built files + run: git ls-files --others --exclude-standard | tar -cvf js-build-${{ github.sha }}.tar -T -
- Consider increasing the retention-days from 1 to match your release cycle length to ensure artifacts are available for potential rollbacks or debugging.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.github/actions/local-network/action.yaml(3 hunks).github/workflows/release.yml(3 hunks).github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests-codeql.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/tests-dashmate.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests-js-package.yml(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- .github/actions/local-network/action.yaml
- .github/workflows/tests-codeql.yml
- .github/workflows/tests-dashmate.yml
- .github/workflows/tests-js-package.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml
84-84: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:1:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
84-84: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
84-84: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:45: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
84-84: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:15: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml (1)
25-25: LGTM: Consistent conditional execution implementation
The conditional checks using if: ${{ steps.check-artifact.outputs.exists != 'true' }} are correctly implemented across all steps, ensuring efficient workflow execution by skipping unnecessary steps when artifacts exist.
Also applies to: 32-32, 36-36, 42-42
.github/workflows/release.yml (2)
43-46: LGTM: Efficient artifact existence checking implementation
Good optimization to avoid unnecessary rebuilds by checking for existing artifacts first.
249-253: LGTM: Clean artifact download implementation
The switch to actions/download-artifact@v4 is implemented correctly with proper path configuration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml (1)
Line range hint
8-14: Remove unnecessary AWS credentials configurationSince the workflow has been migrated to use GitHub Actions cache instead of S3, the AWS credentials configuration step is no longer needed and should be removed.
- - name: Configure AWS credentials and bucket region - uses: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v4 - with: - aws-access-key-id: ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID }} - aws-secret-access-key: ${{ secrets.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY }} - aws-region: ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }}🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
62-62: expecting a single ${{...}} expression or mapping value for "env" section, but found plain text node
(syntax-check)
70-70: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:2:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml (1)
Line range hint
21-35: Remove unused S3-related inputsSince we're switching from S3 to GitHub Actions cache, the following inputs should be removed as they're no longer used:
bucketregionaws_access_key_idaws_secret_access_keypackages/rs-drive-abci/src/metrics.rs (1)
Line range hint
249-251: Document timestamp overflow behaviorWhile the implementation is correct, consider adding documentation about timestamp overflow behavior for future maintainers.
Add the following documentation:
/// Set time of last block into [COUNTER_LAST_BLOCK_TIME]. +/// +/// # Arguments +/// +/// * `time` - Unix timestamp in seconds since epoch. Note that this value wraps around in 2038 +/// for 32-bit systems or in ~292 billion years for 64-bit systems. pub fn abci_last_block_time(time: u64) { counter!(COUNTER_LAST_BLOCK_TIME).absolute(time); }.github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml (1)
40-45: Consider creating a reusable action for sccache configurationThe sccache configuration step is duplicated across multiple jobs. Consider creating a reusable composite action to reduce duplication and simplify maintenance.
Create a new composite action at
.github/actions/configure-sccache/action.yml:name: 'Configure sccache' description: 'Configures sccache for GitHub Actions cache' runs: using: "composite" steps: - uses: actions/github-script@v7 with: script: | core.exportVariable('ACTIONS_CACHE_URL', process.env.ACTIONS_CACHE_URL || ''); core.exportVariable('ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN', process.env.ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN || '');Then replace the duplicated configuration with:
- name: Configure sccache uses: ./.github/actions/configure-sccacheAlso applies to: 75-80, 120-125, 223-228, 270-275
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/release.yml(3 hunks).github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml(7 hunks)packages/rs-drive-abci/src/metrics.rs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml
62-62: expecting a single ${{...}} expression or mapping value for "env" section, but found plain text node
(syntax-check)
83-83: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:1:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
83-83: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
83-83: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:45: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
83-83: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:15: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
.github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml
83-83: expecting a single ${{...}} expression or mapping value for "env" section, but found plain text node
(syntax-check)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml (2)
89-120: Well-implemented caching strategy!
The new caching implementation:
- Uses the latest
actions/cache@v4 - Has proper cache key construction using lock files
- Implements efficient cache restoration with fallback keys
- Correctly injects caches into Docker builds
Also applies to: 121-147
171-172: Verify registry cache configuration
The registry cache configuration looks correct, but let's verify that:
- The build-cache tag is not conflicting with any existing tags
- The registry has sufficient storage for the cache
✅ Verification successful
Registry cache configuration is correctly implemented
The registry cache configuration is properly set up:
- The
build-cachetag is dedicated for caching and won't conflict with other tags as it's specifically used in thedocker/build-push-actioncache configuration - The cache mode is set to
maxwhich is appropriate for build caching - The registry cache replaces the commented out S3-based caching, which is a valid and common approach for Docker layer caching
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if build-cache tag exists and when it was last updated
gh api \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json" \
"/v2/repositories/${{ inputs.image_org }}/${{ inputs.image_name }}/tags" | \
jq '.[] | select(.name=="build-cache")'
Length of output: 178
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the workflow files to understand the image organization and name patterns
fd -e yaml -e yml . .github/workflows/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 58765
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Docker build configuration files to understand the cache usage
fd -e yaml -e yml . .github/actions/docker/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 6423
.github/workflows/release.yml (4)
64-70: LGTM! Clean sccache configuration setup
The implementation correctly exports the required GitHub Actions cache variables and includes proper conditional execution.
136-154: LGTM! Well-implemented artifact handling
The implementation follows best practices with proper error handling, retention settings, and conditional execution.
Line range hint 1-324: Verify complete transition from S3 to GitHub Actions cache
Let's ensure all S3 references have been properly replaced with GitHub Actions cache equivalents.
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any remaining S3 references in workflow files
rg -i 's3|aws' .github/workflows/43-46: Verify the reliability of the third-party action
The softwareforgood/check-artifact-v4-existence@v0 action is relatively new. Consider using the official actions/cache with cache key existence check instead for better long-term maintainability.
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/metrics.rs (2)
14-14: LGTM: Well-documented constant for block time tracking
The new constant follows the established naming convention and is appropriately documented.
Line range hint 182-187: LGTM: Proper metric registration with correct units
The block time metric is properly registered with:
- Appropriate unit specification (
metrics::Unit::Seconds) - Clear description
- Thread-safe initialization
.github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml (2)
Line range hint 1-11: LGTM: Simplified workflow inputs
The removal of dynamic runner inputs in favor of a standardized runner simplifies the workflow configuration.
16-16: LGTM: Standardized runner environment
The consistent use of ubuntu-24.04 across all jobs ensures a uniform build environment and simplifies workflow maintenance.
Also applies to: 204-204, 244-244
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml (1)
Line range hint
8-14: Remove AWS credentials configurationSince we're transitioning from S3 to GitHub Actions cache, the AWS credentials configuration step is no longer needed and should be removed.
- - name: Configure AWS credentials and bucket region - uses: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v4 - with: - aws-access-key-id: ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID }} - aws-secret-access-key: ${{ secrets.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY }} - aws-region: ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }}🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
70-70: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:2:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml(7 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml
83-83: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:1:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
83-83: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
83-83: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:45: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
83-83: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:15: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/metrics.rs (1)
Line range hint
266-268: Add documentation comments for consistency.The function implementation is correct, but it lacks documentation comments. Consider adding documentation similar to other functions in the file.
Add documentation following the established pattern:
+/// Sets the time of the last block in seconds since epoch. +/// +/// # Examples +/// +/// ``` +/// use drive_abci::metrics::abci_last_block_time; +/// +/// let time = 1699564800; // November 10, 2023 00:00:00 UTC +/// abci_last_block_time(time); +/// ``` pub fn abci_last_block_time(time: u64) { counter!(COUNTER_LAST_BLOCK_TIME).absolute(time); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/metrics.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/metrics.rs (3)
14-14: LGTM: Well-documented metric constant.
The constant follows proper naming conventions and includes clear documentation.
Line range hint 173-177: LGTM: Proper metric registration with unit specification.
The metric is correctly registered with appropriate description and unit specification, ensuring consistent initialization through the Once guard.
Line range hint 1-268: Verify the relationship with PR objectives.
While the changes to add block time metrics are well-implemented, they seem unrelated to the PR's stated objective of switching from S3 to GitHub Action cache. Please clarify if these changes are necessary for the cache migration or if they should be in a separate PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
.github/actions/s3-layer-cache-settings/action.yaml (1)
Line range hint
41-57: Consider improving documentation for manifest naming strategyWhile the implementation is solid, the relationship between the three manifest names and their specific purposes could be better documented:
name_sha_[commit]- For builds of specific commitname_tag_[branch]- For builds of specific branchname- For all buildsAdd this documentation to the action description:
description: | This action generates string with s3-based cache configuration for docker buildx. It defines three manifests: - - name and current commit to hit all builds for this commit (restart) with this name - - name and head ref to hit all builds for this branch with this name - - just name to hit all builds for this name + - [name]_sha_[commit]: Caches specific to the current commit (useful for build restarts) + - [name]_tag_[branch]: Caches shared across all builds in a branch + - [name]: Global fallback cache for all builds with this name.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml (2)
Line range hint
8-14: Remove AWS configuration as part of S3 to GitHub Actions cache migrationSince we're transitioning from S3 to GitHub Actions cache, the AWS credentials configuration step and S3-related environment variables should be removed:
- - name: Configure AWS credentials and bucket region - uses: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v4 - with: - aws-access-key-id: ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID }} - aws-secret-access-key: ${{ secrets.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY }} - aws-region: ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }} - name: Build JS packages run: yarn build env: RUSTC_WRAPPER: sccache - SCCACHE_BUCKET: multi-runner-cache-x1xibo9c - SCCACHE_REGION: ${{ secrets.AWS_REGION }} - SCCACHE_S3_KEY_PREFIX: ${{ runner.os }}/sccache/wasm/wasm32Also applies to: 54-58
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
62-62: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:2:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
25-25: Optimize workflow by using job-level conditionsThe condition
if: ${{ steps.check-artifact.outputs.exists != 'true' }}is repeated across multiple steps. Consider using a job-level condition to improve maintainability:jobs: build-js: name: Build JS runs-on: ubuntu-24.04 steps: - uses: softwareforgood/check-artifact-v4-existence@v0 id: check-artifact with: name: js-build-${{ github.sha }} build-and-upload: name: Build and Upload JS needs: build-js if: ${{ needs.build-js.outputs.exists != 'true' }} runs-on: ubuntu-24.04 steps: # Move all steps with the condition here # Remove individual conditionsAlso applies to: 32-32, 36-36, 42-42, 46-46, 50-50, 59-59, 71-71, 79-79, 89-89
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml (2)
119-127: Well-structured Yarn caching with platform awarenessThe Yarn cache implementation correctly handles platform-specific caching, which is crucial for cross-platform builds.
Consider adding a comment explaining why unplugged cache is specifically needed, as it's a less common Yarn feature.
87-146: Well-architected caching strategyThe implementation of GitHub Actions cache for both Cargo and Yarn dependencies is well-architected with:
- Proper separation of concerns between caching and injection
- Platform-aware caching strategy
- Efficient cache key management
- Proper integration with BuildKit
This provides a solid foundation for the transition from S3 to GitHub Actions cache.
Consider documenting the caching strategy in the repository's documentation to help other contributors understand the caching mechanism and its configuration.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml(2 hunks).github/actions/s3-layer-cache-settings/action.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/release.yml(4 hunks).github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/tests-rs-package.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/release.yml
132-132: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:1:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
132-132: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
132-132: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:45: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
132-132: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:15: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
.github/workflows/tests-build-js.yml
75-75: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2129:style:1:1: Consider using { cmd1; cmd2; } >> file instead of individual redirects
(shellcheck)
75-75: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:22: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
75-75: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:2:45: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
75-75: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:3:15: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml (6)
83-98: Well-structured Cargo caching implementation
The Cargo cache configuration is well-implemented with:
- Proper cache key strategy using Cargo.lock
- Appropriate restore-keys fallback
- Well-organized cache paths for registry and git data
99-118: Well-implemented cache injection mechanism
The cache injection using buildkit-cache-dance is properly configured with:
- Correct mapping of cache directories to Docker paths
- Proper cache hit detection to skip extraction when possible
128-134: Clean architecture extraction implementation
The architecture extraction is implemented efficiently using GitHub Script.
135-146: Well-implemented Yarn cache injection
The Yarn cache injection follows the same robust pattern as the Cargo cache injection, with proper platform-specific cache IDs.
160-166: Remove commented S3-related configurations
As mentioned in a previous review, please remove all commented-out code related to S3 caching (sccache and registry cache configurations). This code can be retrieved from git history if needed in the future.
Also applies to: 169-170
62-64: Verify implications of disabled BuildKit garbage collection
Disabling garbage collection (gc = false) in the BuildKit configuration could lead to increased disk usage over time. While this might be intentional for caching purposes, please ensure that:
- The runner has sufficient disk space
- There's a cleanup mechanism in place for old cache data
✅ Verification successful
BuildKit garbage collection configuration is safe to disable
The disabled garbage collection in BuildKit is safe because:
- The action uses GitHub's
actions/cache@v4for both Cargo and Yarn caches, which has built-in cache management and size limits - BuildKit's cache is scoped to individual workflow runs as the runner is ephemeral
- The
docker/setup-buildx-action@v3hascleanup: falsewhich is consistent with the gc setting for maintaining cache during the build
The configuration aligns with the PR's objective of optimizing caching strategy and doesn't pose disk space risks since GitHub Actions runners are ephemeral.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any cleanup jobs or disk space monitoring in the workflows
rg -l 'actions/github-runner-management|disk|cleanup|prune' .github/workflows/
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any GitHub Actions workflow that handles cache cleanup or maintenance
rg -i "cache.*cleanup|cleanup.*cache|cache.*prune|prune.*cache" .github/workflows/
# Also check if there are any cache expiration or size limit configurations
rg -i "max.*(size|age)|cache.*(size|age)|expir.*cache" .github/workflows/
# Check the Docker build action itself for any cache-related configurations
cat .github/actions/docker/action.yaml
Length of output: 6372
.github/workflows/release.yml (3)
43-46: LGTM: Proper artifact existence check implementation
The artifact check is correctly implemented using the GitHub Actions artifact API, which is more efficient than downloading artifacts to check existence.
Line range hint 53-80: LGTM: Proper conditional execution of build steps
The build steps are correctly conditioned on artifact existence, preventing unnecessary rebuilds when artifacts are available.
138-146: LGTM: Comprehensive artifact upload configuration
The artifact upload step is well-configured with:
- Proper error handling (
if-no-files-found: error) - Hidden files inclusion
- Reasonable retention period
- Conditional execution
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
Dockerfile (2)
315-319: Enhance build profile configuration handlingThe build profile configuration is well-implemented, but the configuration file handling could be more robust.
Consider this improvement:
- mv .cargo/config-release.toml .cargo/config.toml; \ + cp .cargo/config-release.toml .cargo/config.toml; \This change:
- Preserves the original file
- Prevents potential issues if the build needs to be re-run with a different profile
- Makes the build process more idempotent
Also applies to: 338-355
354-355: Optimize target directory cleanupWhile cleaning up the target directory helps reduce image size, the current implementation could be optimized.
Consider these improvements:
- rm -rf target && \ + if [ "${CI:-false}" = "true" ]; then + rm -rf target + fi && \Benefits:
- Preserves the target directory for local development
- Only cleans up in CI environment where space is critical
- Improves build cache utilization in local development
Also applies to: 394-395
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml(3 hunks).github/actions/s3-layer-cache-settings/action.yaml(2 hunks)Dockerfile(5 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/actions/s3-layer-cache-settings/action.yaml
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml (3)
83-86: LGTM: Environment setup is correct
Setting the HOME variable in GITHUB_ENV is the proper way to ensure consistent path references for caching.
Line range hint 149-171: LGTM: Docker build configuration is well structured
The build configuration properly integrates sccache with appropriate AWS credentials and bucket configuration. The cache-from and cache-to settings are correctly configured to work with the GitHub Actions cache.
62-64: Verify implications of disabled garbage collection
Disabling garbage collection (gc = false) in the buildkitd configuration could lead to increased disk usage over time. While this might be intentional for caching purposes, it's important to ensure there's a cleanup strategy in place.
✅ Verification successful
Disabled garbage collection is acceptable with current cache management
The disabled garbage collection (gc = false) is not a concern because:
- GitHub Actions has built-in cache management with 1-day retention policy for artifacts
- The Docker build context is ephemeral within each workflow run
- The buildkitd configuration is specific to the build step and doesn't persist between runs
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any other cleanup mechanisms in place
rg -i "cleanup|prune|gc" .github/actions/
Length of output: 159
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for cache cleanup configurations in GitHub Actions workflows
rg -i "actions/cache|cache-hit|post-cache|cache-cleanup" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 451
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any cache size limits or retention policies
rg -i "max-size|retention|days|cache-limit" .github/workflows/ .github/actions/
Length of output: 275
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for GitHub Actions cache documentation or comments
rg -i "cache.*note|cache.*comment|cache.*doc" .github/workflows/ .github/actions/
Length of output: 960
Dockerfile (1)
184-184: Verify if S3 SSL configuration is still needed
The S3 SSL configuration is commented out. If S3 is still used as a fallback, this could potentially lead to insecure connections.
✅ Verification successful
S3 SSL configuration can be safely removed
The commented out SCCACHE_S3_USE_SSL line is part of a conditional block that only executes when using S3 cache. The codebase now primarily uses GitHub Actions cache, with S3 as an optional fallback. When S3 is used, SSL is enabled by default in recent versions of sccache, making this configuration redundant.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if S3 is still used anywhere in the codebase
rg -l 'SCCACHE_(BUCKET|S3)' --type yaml
Length of output: 315
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of these files for S3 configuration
rg 'SCCACHE_(BUCKET|S3)' --type yaml -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 4514
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there's a conditional setup for S3/GHA cache in the Dockerfile
rg 'SCCACHE_GHA_ENABLED|SCCACHE_BUCKET' Dockerfile -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 2755
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/actions/s3-layer-cache-settings/action.yaml (1)
49-49: TODO comment indicates incomplete implementationThe TODO comment suggests that the generic manifest should only be used on the default branch. However, since we're transitioning to GitHub Actions cache, implementing this feature would be unnecessary work.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/actions/s3-layer-cache-settings/action.yaml(2 hunks)packages/rs-drive-abci/src/lib.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/lib.rs (2)
33-34: LGTM! Clean addition of the metrics module.
The new metrics module is well-documented and properly placed in the module hierarchy.
33-34: Verify metrics module initialization and integration.
Please ensure that the metrics module is properly initialized and integrated with the application's metrics collection system.
Also applies to: 36-38
✅ Verification successful
Metrics module is properly implemented and integrated
The metrics module is well-structured and correctly integrated:
- Prometheus server is properly initialized with configurable listen address
- All metrics are registered using
describe_*functions during initialization - Comprehensive set of metrics covering key areas:
- ABCI request durations
- Block heights and times
- Query durations
- State transition processing
- Withdrawal limits
- Metrics are actively used throughout the codebase with proper labeling and timing measurements
- Implementation includes proper error handling and thread-safe initialization
The metrics subsystem is production-ready and no issues were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for metrics initialization and usage across the codebase
# Look for metrics initialization
ast-grep --pattern 'fn main() {
$$$
metrics::$_($$$)
$$$
}'
# Check for metrics usage patterns
rg -A 3 "use.*metrics::"
# Look for test coverage of metrics
rg -A 5 "#\[test\].*metrics"
Length of output: 7171
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the metrics module implementation and initialization
# Check the metrics module implementation
cat packages/rs-drive-abci/src/metrics.rs
# Check where Prometheus is initialized in main
rg -A 10 "Prometheus::new"
# Check for metric registration and descriptions
rg "describe_(counter|gauge|histogram)"
# Look for actual metric usage
rg "(counter!|gauge!|histogram!)"
Length of output: 15308
.github/actions/s3-layer-cache-settings/action.yaml (2)
18-21: Remove this action as it's obsolete
Making S3 parameters required contradicts the PR objective of transitioning from S3 to GitHub Actions cache. Based on the PR objectives and past reviews, this entire action should be removed as it's no longer in use.
64-69: Code improvements are good but unnecessary
While the changes improve the code structure with better manifest handling and cleaner cache configuration generation, investing in S3 caching improvements contradicts the goal of migrating to GitHub Actions cache.
Let's verify if there are any remaining S3 cache dependencies:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/tests-build-image.yml (1)
51-51: Consider improving the cache condition readability.Good practice using conditional caching based on event type. However, the condition could be more readable and type-safe.
Consider this alternative:
- cache_to_name: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' && 'true' || 'false' }} + cache_to_name: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' }}This change:
- Returns a proper boolean instead of string 'true'/'false'
- Is more concise and easier to understand
- Maintains the same functionality of only caching on push events
.github/actions/s3-layer-cache-settings/action.yaml (2)
59-85: Well-structured implementation, but consider strategic directionThe cache manifest generation logic is well-implemented with good practices:
- Proper sanitization of head ref
- Clear separation of concerns between cache_from and cache_to
- Conditional name manifest generation
However, if we're transitioning away from S3 caching as per PR objectives, we should focus on implementing similar functionality using GitHub Actions cache instead.
Would you like assistance in implementing this using GitHub Actions cache?
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
80-80: Remove trailing spacesThere are trailing spaces on line 80 that should be removed for consistency.
- +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml (1)
91-122: LGTM: Well-implemented Cargo caching strategyThe Cargo caching implementation is robust, using proper cache keys and paths. The cache injection into Docker is handled securely using buildkit-cache-dance.
Consider adding a comment explaining the cache injection mechanism for future maintainers:
+ # Inject cargo cache into docker using buildkit-cache-dance + # This allows sharing the host's cargo cache with the container - name: Inject cargo cache into docker
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml(3 hunks).github/actions/s3-layer-cache-settings/action.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests-build-image.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/actions/s3-layer-cache-settings/action.yaml
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
.github/actions/s3-layer-cache-settings/action.yaml (1)
18-21: Consider removing this action as part of S3 cache migration
I agree with the previous review comment. Based on the PR objectives of transitioning from S3 to GitHub Actions cache, this action should be removed as it's no longer in use. Making S3 configuration mandatory (region and bucket) contradicts the migration goal.
Also applies to: 28-30
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml (6)
40-42: LGTM: Well-documented cache control parameter
The new cache_to_name input parameter is properly documented and safely configured with a default value of 'false'.
83-86: LGTM: Proper S3 cache configuration
The S3 layer cache configuration is properly set up with the necessary parameters for region, bucket, and cache control.
87-90: LGTM: Proper environment setup
Setting HOME in GITHUB_ENV is necessary for the subsequent caching steps and is implemented correctly.
123-149: LGTM: Proper Yarn unplugged caching implementation
The Yarn unplugged caching is well-implemented with platform-specific cache keys and proper Docker injection.
Line range hint 153-173: LGTM with security verification needed
The Docker build configuration is well-structured with proper cache settings and build arguments.
Let's verify the security of the AWS credentials handling:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if AWS credentials are masked in logs
rg -A 5 "AWS_.*_KEY" .github/workflows/
rg -A 5 "secrets\.AWS_" .github/workflows/65-68: Verify implications of disabled garbage collection
Disabling garbage collection (gc = false) for the OCI worker could potentially lead to increased disk usage over time.
Let's verify if this is documented in BuildKit:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another search strategy to find information about BuildKit's garbage collection configuration.
Let me check the content of the Docker documentation file that mentions worker.oci configuration.
BuildKit GC disabled: Intentional for CI/CD caching
Based on the documentation, disabling garbage collection (gc = false) in the BuildKit configuration is intentional for CI/CD environments. This setting helps maintain build caches between workflow runs, which is crucial for:
- Preserving Docker layer caches
- Maintaining cache mounts for Rust dependencies and target directories
- Optimizing build times in CI/CD pipelines
The documentation shows that for local development, GC should be enabled with appropriate size limits, but CI/CD environments often require persistent caches to speed up builds.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation about gc configuration
rg -A 5 "gc.*=.*false" .
rg -A 5 "worker.oci" .
Length of output: 26385
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for BuildKit configuration and gc settings
rg -i "buildkit.*gc" .
rg -i "worker.oci" .
rg -i "buildkitd.*config" .
Length of output: 146
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check Docker documentation for BuildKit GC configuration
cat ./docs/DOCKER.md
Length of output: 4771
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/actions/s3-layer-cache-settings/action.yaml (1)
80-80: Remove trailing whitespaceThere's a trailing whitespace on this line.
- +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/actions/docker/action.yaml(3 hunks).github/actions/s3-layer-cache-settings/action.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/tests-build-image.yml(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/actions/docker/action.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/actions/s3-layer-cache-settings/action.yaml
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/actions/s3-layer-cache-settings/action.yaml (2)
18-30: Consider removing this action as it appears to be obsolete
Based on the PR objectives and recent commits, we're transitioning from S3 to GitHub Actions cache. This action appears to be obsolete as:
- No workflow files reference this action anymore
- Recent commits show removal of S3-based caching:
febf93eb build: remove target and s3 for layercache71bddbab ci: layer to registry, disable sccache
Line range hint 1-85: Verify if this action can be safely removed
Let's verify that this action is truly obsolete and can be safely removed.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
We not efficiently using different types of caching. Docker layer cache doesn't work.
What was done?
How Has This Been Tested?
Running CI
Breaking Changes
None
Checklist:
For repository code-owners and collaborators only
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
sccachefor better caching management in Rust jobs.Bug Fixes
fail-on-cache-missparameters.Documentation
Refactor
actions/cache@v4.Chores