chore: make protocol version 6 #2327
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the versioning system within the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mod.rs (1)
24-24: Consider version update implications.While the implementation is correct, consider the following recommendations:
- Ensure documentation is updated to reflect the new protocol version
- Verify if this version increment is part of a planned release
- Consider adding a changelog entry if not already present
Would you like assistance in identifying documentation that needs updates or generating a changelog entry?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mod.rs(2 hunks)packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/protocol_version.rs(3 hunks)packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v6.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mod.rs (1)
2-2: Implementation looks correct for protocol version update.
The changes follow the established pattern for version updates:
- Import of new version constant
- Addition of new version module
- Update of LATEST_VERSION constant
Let's verify the v6 module implementation and its dependencies:
Also applies to: 20-20, 24-24
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Protocol version 6 implementation is correctly structured and consistent
The verification confirms:
- v6 module exists at
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v6.rs - PROTOCOL_VERSION_6 constant is properly defined as
6 - All dependent systems use LATEST_VERSION constant instead of hardcoded values
- Version update follows the established pattern seen in v1-v5 modules
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify v6 module implementation and dependencies
# Check if v6.rs exists and contains required constants
echo "Checking v6 module implementation..."
fd -e rs "v6.rs$" packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/
# Verify PROTOCOL_VERSION_6 constant definition
echo "Checking protocol version constant..."
rg -A 1 "PROTOCOL_VERSION_6\s*:\s*ProtocolVersion\s*=" packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/
# Look for any potential version checks in the codebase that might need updates
echo "Checking version dependencies..."
rg -A 2 "LATEST_VERSION|PROTOCOL_VERSION_[0-9]" --type rust
Length of output: 34678
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v6.rs (5)
1-27: LGTM! Imports are well-organized and properly scoped.
The imports appropriately reference all necessary versioned components required for the platform version configuration.
29-30: LGTM! Protocol version increment is straightforward and correct.
The constant definition aligns with the PR objective to update the protocol version to 6.
32-63: LGTM! Platform version configuration is comprehensive.
The PLATFORM_V6 constant properly initializes all required components with their respective versions. The structure maintains consistency with the platform's versioning system.
60-62: Verify consensus version compatibility.
The consensus version is set to 1 while the protocol version is 6. Let's verify this is intentional and doesn't indicate a missing version update.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other consensus version references
echo "Checking consensus version usage across platform versions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'consensus: ConsensusVersions { tenderdash_consensus_version: $_,$$$}'
# Search for any consensus version documentation
echo "Checking for consensus version documentation..."
rg -l 'tenderdash.?consensus.?version' --type-add 'docs:*.{md,txt,rst}' --type docs31-32: Verify implementation of mentioned features.
The comment indicates this version will add multisig support and reduce withdrawal burdens. Let's verify the implementation of these features.
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/protocol_version.rs (2)
23-23: Implementation looks good
The version update is implemented correctly:
- Import statement is properly added
- Version is correctly added to the PLATFORM_VERSIONS array
- LATEST_PLATFORM_VERSION is properly updated
Also applies to: 45-45, 54-54
23-23: Verify the implications of updating to PLATFORM_V6
The implementation correctly updates the protocol version to v6 across all necessary locations. However, this change has important implications:
- This is effectively a breaking change as it updates the latest platform version
- Clients and dependent systems need to be aware of this version bump
- Proper migration paths should exist for systems running on v5
Let's verify the version update implications:
Consider documenting:
- The rationale for the version bump
- Breaking changes or new features in v6
- Migration steps for systems running on v5
Also applies to: 45-45, 54-54
✅ Verification successful
Version 6 update is properly documented with clear implementation details
Based on the verification results, the version 6 update is well-structured and properly implemented:
- The
v6.rsmodule clearly documents that "This version will add multisig support and reduce withdrawal burdens" - The implementation shows a comprehensive update across all platform components:
- Uses DRIVE_VERSION_V2
- Updates to DRIVE_ABCI_METHOD_VERSIONS_V4
- Includes DPP_VALIDATION_VERSIONS_V2 and STATE_TRANSITION_VERSIONS_V2
- Maintains compatibility with existing version management infrastructure
The version-specific handling in the codebase (found in rs-drive) shows proper version validation, ensuring safe version transitions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for version-dependent code and migration paths
# Check for version-specific handling in the codebase
rg -A 3 "match.*protocol_version"
# Look for migration guides or upgrade notes
fd -g "MIGRATION*.md" -g "UPGRADE*.md" -g "CHANGELOG*.md"
Length of output: 1363
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for version-related changes and documentation
# Look for version-specific code changes and breaking changes
rg -A 5 "PLATFORM_V6"
# Check for any documentation about version 6 changes
rg -A 5 "version 6|v6" README.md docs/ 2>/dev/null
# Look for changelog files with different extensions
fd -e md -e txt -g "*CHANGELOG*" -g "*UPGRADE*" -g "*MIGRATION*"
# Check the v6 module implementation
fd "v6.rs" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 6414
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Just bumping the protocol version to version 6.
What was done?
How Has This Been Tested?
Breaking Changes
Checklist:
For repository code-owners and collaborators only
Summary by CodeRabbit