-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Somehow make it clear to people that they shouldn't contact official Bitwarden support #336
Comments
There's already notice in the readme. I don't think many users actually read that carefully as we'd hope though. To me it looks like many of the users simply reach out to you through the support links in the app. Perhaps we could agree on some API call that would identify third party server (and maybe even the project url or something like that) and direct people there instead? (Or show a warning near the support link explaining that they aren't using official server and where to seek help) I'm personally fine with people raising issues here first even if it turns out to be client side issue. Just my 2c, @dani-garcia, any thoughts from your side? |
Thanks guys. Let's just go with the changes to the README and launch message for now and we'll see if things get better. |
I think we can close this one for now @dani-garcia? The release 1.6.1 with the warning is now out. |
Yeah, let's close it for now to avoid cluttering the list. If it continues being a problem, we'll reopen it again. |
We frequently get people using these third party servers that contact official support channels for help with problems they are having with it. Lots of times we go back and forth trying to figure out what the problem they are having is only to find out later they are using a third-party server (which they originally fail to mention) and we can't help. This is a drain on resources for the official Bitwarden product. I am not sure what the solution is, but could you brainstorm ideas on how to better communicate to users that they shouldn't do this? I suppose a simple start would be to put a notice in the README or something but I am not sure that is going to solve the problem completely.
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: