You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Process losses are pretty common throughout much of the fuel cycle, but Separations is the only archetype with an efficiency, putting the losses in the leftover commod. A few other archetypes would benefit from having a loss stream, especially Mixer, Enrichment. Storage could also have a loss stream, which could be paired with another archetype to model losses in a roundabout way.
For example, 0.2% fuel fabrication losses are a common modeling choice but I don't think that's usually modeled in Cyclus simulations using Cycamore agents because we don't have an easy way to do that
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This would be good to put in a toolkit. I think it substantively different from the role of losses in separations, so we'll have to be careful about that. (maybe)
Process losses are pretty common throughout much of the fuel cycle, but Separations is the only archetype with an efficiency, putting the losses in the leftover commod. A few other archetypes would benefit from having a loss stream, especially Mixer, Enrichment. Storage could also have a loss stream, which could be paired with another archetype to model losses in a roundabout way.
For example, 0.2% fuel fabrication losses are a common modeling choice but I don't think that's usually modeled in Cyclus simulations using Cycamore agents because we don't have an easy way to do that
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: