bicycle_road=yes on highway=cycleway not rendered

[tordans]

I am wondering, why the bottom segment https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=18/52.48459/13.44465/cyclosm of Weigandufer is not blue. It should at least be a blue line because of the highway=cycleway, right? But even more, IMO the whole road width should be blue because of the bicycle_road=yes. Right now, the safest part of that road is not shows as bike infrastructure :).

• top part https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/744158640#map=19/52.48483/13.44414
• bottom part https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859427215#map=18/52.48412/13.44547 (the issue here)
• mapillary https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1287704951654498&focus=photo

--

Follow up to #150

[Florimondable]

It's due to the tag vehicle=no, a bicycle is a vehicle, so the cycleway is rendered in grey as not allowed for bicycle.

About bicycle_road it's weird to have this tag on a cycleway, though after seeing mapillary I can understand why : there is the Fahrradstraße board.

[tordans]

Thanks for helping with debugging this. We discussed it locally and found, that we broke the tagging at the beginning of the year. History. The segment is now blue again.

I would still argue, that anything with bicycle_road=yes should be shown more like a highway=service or highway=residential that a "thin", regular highway=cycleway. In my mind, the "bicycle_road" tagging could just as easily be "highway=bicycle_road" which probably did not happen historically because we don't change the highway-schema anymore. But for a full bicycle_road (aka no other traffic than bikes), the highway=cycleway + bicycle_road=yes feels like the best tagging to describe the function of the street.

Feel free to close if you don't want to change this.