Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle living_street=yes #146

Closed
Phyks opened this issue Jul 24, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Handle living_street=yes #146

Phyks opened this issue Jul 24, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement An already rendered feature which should be improved.

Comments

@Phyks
Copy link
Member

Phyks commented Jul 24, 2019

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:living_street

An highway=secondary + living_street=yes should be considered as an highway=living_street, probably with a slight penalty compared to the latter one.

@Phyks Phyks added the enhancement An already rendered feature which should be improved. label Jul 24, 2019
@althio
Copy link

althio commented Jul 24, 2019

Maybe something should be kept similar to highway=secondary rendering (eg. 'secondary' casing).

See also more related discussion/background gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto#3514

@Florimondable
Copy link
Member

Florimondable commented Feb 19, 2020

«It is supposed to mark a road that has a different classification than 'living street' but is a living street.»
living_street=yes is a something different than a proper living street, so I think we should not trust this tag alone to know if a street is quiet or not.

It seems to be used a lot in Russia for roads next to high-rise block (tagged as service + living_street=yes)

@Phyks
Copy link
Member Author

Phyks commented Mar 15, 2020

living_street=yes is deprecated as per the wiki and rejected on the main osm.org render.

I'll close this issue for the moment as not relevant directly for CyclOSM render then. It might still be a really useful feature (I think so, at least), so we should probably try to resubmit it to tagging ML?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement An already rendered feature which should be improved.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants