Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for S3 compatible storage providers (eg MinIO) #3996

Closed
2 tasks done
qsineu opened this issue Dec 7, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #4353
Closed
2 tasks done

Add support for S3 compatible storage providers (eg MinIO) #3996

qsineu opened this issue Dec 7, 2021 · 4 comments · Fixed by #4353
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@qsineu
Copy link

qsineu commented Dec 7, 2021

My actions before raising this issue

Expected Behaviour

The new clowd storage feature is great but we have our Data on a private s3 compatible storage. There are multiple offerings for such storage on the market and it would be great if those would be usable as well.

Current Behaviour

Currently the AWS S3 cloud storage provider only supports AWS hosted S3 buckets.

Possible Solution

In essence we need a way to configure endpoint_url for the boto3 resource when adding a cloud storage.

@Marishka17 Marishka17 added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 7, 2021
@lozhn
Copy link

lozhn commented Jan 14, 2022

Can you please add parameter
endpoint_url here (maybe set its default value to s3.amazonaws.com or so ) and 1 more field to the form ? That would enable using minio as an S3 compatible storage 🤗

@nmanovic
Copy link
Contributor

@lozhn , could you please contribute the feature?

@lozhn
Copy link

lozhn commented Jan 14, 2022

@nmanovic I'll try next week ;)

@Rekha-Prakash
Copy link

Rekha-Prakash commented Jan 17, 2022

@Marishka17 I am also looking for this feature, since I use MinIO for storage.
@lozhn , Thanks for contributing on this. Is there any timeline on this when this will be implemented ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants