Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggestion: tools #1049

Closed
test4fest opened this issue Jan 13, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #1051
Closed

Suggestion: tools #1049

test4fest opened this issue Jan 13, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #1051
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@test4fest
Copy link

test4fest commented Jan 13, 2020

I am using the CVAT tool, it's great.
It would be great if you can improve two things:
1- Auto annotation: map model label to different Openvino labels
It means that we might have different type of categories of the same objects but the model recognize it as one object.

2- After creating a task it's impossible to remove some labels from it. I need to create another task with a new defined labels.

Thanks

@test4fest test4fest changed the title Suggestion: Suggestion: tools Jan 13, 2020
@nmanovic
Copy link
Contributor

@test4fest ,

  1. It is possible already now.
  2. You can use admin panel if it is absolutely necessary. The operation isn't safe.

Does it answer your question?

@nmanovic nmanovic added the question Further information is requested label Jan 13, 2020
@bsekachev
Copy link
Member

@nmanovic

  1. It is possible already now.

Not exactly. There isn't support one model label to many task labels in the client. But it should be easy to implement if server works with it.

@test4fest
Copy link
Author

test4fest commented Jan 13, 2020

Thanks a lot.
your respond helped me.
let me know if the first question is implemented.

@bsekachev
Copy link
Member

@test4fest

Implemented

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants