We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe the bug
We made a change to add a _tel between the container prefix and the field name to distinguish mono predictions from stereo predictions when loaded into the same table, code here: https://github.com/cta-observatory/ctapipe/blob/main/ctapipe/reco/utils.py
_tel
We do this also with the per-telescope disp output, which has no stereo equivalent.
The reconstructor is also filling the table without this prefix, so the value with the tel_ prefix is added.
tel_
To Reproduce
Run the unit tests for the disp reconstructor, inspect the output:
['disp_parameter_norm', 'disp_parameter_is_valid', 'disp_parameter_tel_norm', 'disp_parameter_tel_is_valid']
Expected behavior
Only have the disp_paremeter_norm and disp_parameter_is_valid columns
disp_paremeter_norm
disp_parameter_is_valid
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think this is closed by #2440, right?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Yes, forgot to link it
No branches or pull requests
Describe the bug
We made a change to add a
_tel
between the container prefix and the field name to distinguish mono predictions from stereo predictions when loaded into the same table, code here:https://github.com/cta-observatory/ctapipe/blob/main/ctapipe/reco/utils.py
We do this also with the per-telescope disp output, which has no stereo equivalent.
The reconstructor is also filling the table without this prefix, so the value with the
tel_
prefix is added.To Reproduce
Run the unit tests for the disp reconstructor, inspect the output:
Expected behavior
Only have the
disp_paremeter_norm
anddisp_parameter_is_valid
columnsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: