Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] Read-only Event Templates from mounted volume #431

Closed
andrewazores opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #445
Closed

[Request] Read-only Event Templates from mounted volume #431

andrewazores opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #445
Assignees
Labels
feat New feature or request

Comments

@andrewazores
Copy link
Member

Describe the feature

Previous versions of Cryostat stored custom event template configuration files directly in the container's filesystem, which would in practice be a mounted volume. The Operator used this fact to provide a feature allowing users to pre-populate the volume with event templates.

Now that custom event templates are stored in S3 object storage it is impractical for the Operator to directly mount the event templates into the storage location. However, the Operator can (and still does) continue to provide a volume mount containing the event template files. Cryostat can either read these files at startup and try to upload them into S3 storage, or it can use them as an additional store location.

Anything other information?

No response

@andrewazores andrewazores added the feat New feature or request label May 3, 2024
@andrewazores andrewazores moved this to Todo in 3.0.0 release May 3, 2024
@andrewazores andrewazores self-assigned this May 3, 2024
@andrewazores
Copy link
Member Author

Also related, since the "mounted volume" concept is the same, is #330 / #355 . The Operator shares application TLS certificates with Cryostat in the same way, so we must validate that 3.0's implementation still reads from the same location where the Operator mounts them.

@andrewazores
Copy link
Member Author

image

Looks like the Operator's truststore mounting mechanism still works as expeted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feat New feature or request
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant