-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 386
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is it possible to get coverage by tests? #117
Comments
HI @yamac-kurtulus, the different output file formats contain that information. You can use https://github.com/danielpalme/ReportGenerator with the Opencover and Cobertura output formats |
@tonerdo, Note: Thanks for the awesome code coverage tool by the way. Coverlet is great and I want to keep using, but I need the coverage by tests info :/ @hack2root thank you for the advice, however I think it is possible in VS professional, I am using community edition. Besides, I want to publish output results using report generator and not stick to VS. |
FYI, It's an enterprise feature, not professional |
@latop2604 that's even harder for me to get then, oh well :/ |
Hi, any update about this? this feature is very usefull and we cant use it today |
I'm not sure that is possible with current file format FWIK coverage format fail save only branches/sequence points visited but we don't know who is the test top caller. |
This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no activity. |
I looked for, but couldn't find an answer. Is it possible to find information about which tests cover what part of the code? If not, do you plan to implement it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: