Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fairness across channels & connections #549

Open
cwgoes opened this issue Jun 25, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Fairness across channels & connections #549

cwgoes opened this issue Jun 25, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
brainstorming Open-ended brainstorming. tao Transport, authentication, & ordering layer.

Comments

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor

cwgoes commented Jun 25, 2019

Split off from #126.

Possible sorts of fairness:

  • Fairness across all connections on a chain
  • Fairness across set of connections between two chains
  • Fairness across set of channels on a connection

Priority of given message determined by sender, costs may vary according to priority.

Note that we can at most restrict validator ordering choices, and neither connections nor channels are by default scarce, so scarcity would need to be imposed (with cost, or escrowed deposits required to open a connection / channel).

@cwgoes cwgoes transferred this issue from cosmos/ibc Feb 23, 2021
@cwgoes cwgoes transferred this issue from another repository Mar 23, 2021
@mpoke mpoke added tao Transport, authentication, & ordering layer. brainstorming Open-ended brainstorming. labels Mar 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
brainstorming Open-ended brainstorming. tao Transport, authentication, & ordering layer.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants