ICS 13: Interchain Address Format

[mossid]

Will cover:

• New address type which is (ChainID, Address) that allows chains directly control an address on another chain

[cwgoes]

Hmm, is this how we should structure it? What about having a ChainAccount standardized, which allows another blockchain to "sign" transactions instead of a user?

(I think we need more than an address type, with the way authentication is likely to work, such as in the current Cosmos SDK)

[mossid]

There may be some situations that we need separated entities on a single chain, even they are all controlled by the chain. e.g. contracts on a chain should not violate each other's asset on another chain. So if the ChainAccount contains an additional(/optional) parameter which can be used for the secondary identifier, it looks good for me.

[cwgoes]

@mossid Is this a subset of #211 or a separate standard?

[cwgoes]

Closing in favor of #278.