You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This ticket is created to track the work on whether we can remove VSCMaturedPackets from cross chain validation.
The problem behind the VSCMaturedPackets is that they pause unbonding on the provider chain. The provider chain can only unbond tokens after it has received VSCMaturedPackets from all the consumer chains. The use of VSCMaturedPacket complicates the protocol and can lead to unbonding delays (e.g., see here).
The content you are editing has changed. Please copy your edits and refresh the page.
Closing the whole EPIC because we reached to the conclusion that we cannot remove VSCMaturedPackets as is without potentially compromising the security of 3rd-party-chain light clients that track a consumer chain. This is shown in this document.
Problem
This ticket is created to track the work on whether we can remove
VSCMaturedPacket
s from cross chain validation.The problem behind the
VSCMaturedPacket
s is that they pause unbonding on the provider chain. The provider chain can only unbond tokens after it has receivedVSCMaturedPacket
s from all the consumer chains. The use ofVSCMaturedPacket
complicates the protocol and can lead to unbonding delays (e.g., see here).Tasks (to be updated)
Closing criteria
Reach to a conclusion on whether we can get rid of
VSCMaturedPacket
or not and under what assumptions.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: