Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v0.45 compatible Rho Meta Issue #1909

Closed
25 of 27 tasks
okwme opened this issue Nov 17, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed
25 of 27 tasks

v0.45 compatible Rho Meta Issue #1909

okwme opened this issue Nov 17, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@okwme
Copy link
Contributor

okwme commented Nov 17, 2022

In order to improve chances of ICS launching on time we're considering using v0.45.x for the next upgrade Rho. This may or may not include ICS itself but nonetheless should decrease the work needed to integrate ICS. Since the Cosmos Hub is becoming a security critical chain (security as the primary product offering) we are also considering a much more conservative timeline to updating to the latest release of the Cosmos SDK. To follow this path the following work needs to be done:

@yaruwangway
Copy link
Contributor

add upgrade test, i disabled it for now since the upgrade version is wrong and test failed.

@yaruwangway
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @okwme
"regenerate swagger files without mauth" means keep present swagger files for mauth or no need swagger files for mauth

@okwme
Copy link
Contributor Author

okwme commented Dec 1, 2022

add upgrade test, i disabled it for now since the upgrade version is wrong and test failed.

re-enabled since we still need to perform an upgrade

@okwme
Copy link
Contributor Author

okwme commented Dec 1, 2022

Hi, @okwme "regenerate swagger files without mauth" means keep present swagger files for mauth or no need swagger files for mauth

no need for mauth in this release. It would be a nice to have but not essential so being removed to ensure we support the ICS timeline.

@mpoke
Copy link
Contributor

mpoke commented Jan 20, 2023

Closing in favor of #2032 and #2034

@mpoke mpoke closed this as completed Jan 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants