Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

code coverage #1901

Closed
5 tasks
okwme opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1903
Closed
5 tasks

code coverage #1901

okwme opened this issue Nov 15, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1903
Assignees
Labels
scope: testing Code review, testing, making sure the code is following the specification. type: tech-debt Slows down development in the long run

Comments

@okwme
Copy link
Contributor

okwme commented Nov 15, 2022

Summary

PR #1897 and #1858 both included increased unit test coverage, however both reported a reduction of coverage.

Type

Infrastructure Debt
Test Automation Debt
Test Debt

Impact

PRs contain incorrect failing checks

Proposed Solution

Investigate code coverage configuration and create a doc explaining how it works and how to configure it


For Admin Use

  • Not duplicate issue
  • Appropriate labels applied
  • Appropriate contributors tagged
  • Contributor assigned/self-assigned
  • Is a spike necessary to map out how the issue should be approached?
@okwme okwme added scope: testing Code review, testing, making sure the code is following the specification. type: tech-debt Slows down development in the long run labels Nov 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
scope: testing Code review, testing, making sure the code is following the specification. type: tech-debt Slows down development in the long run
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants