We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Apparently we assume that ModuleName == PortName in MsgPacket, this is just wrong.
ModuleName == PortName
MsgPacket
Either we need a static routing table mapping port names to module names or we need to wait for ADR 3 (dynamic capabilities) to be implemented.
cc @AdityaSripal any thoughts here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@alexanderbez Are you interested in working on this 🙏 ?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Closing in favour of #5542.
No branches or pull requests
Apparently we assume that
ModuleName == PortName
inMsgPacket
, this is just wrong.Either we need a static routing table mapping port names to module names or we need to wait for ADR 3 (dynamic capabilities) to be implemented.
cc @AdityaSripal any thoughts here?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: