Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Either implement static port mapping or implement dynamic capabilites #5809

Closed
cwgoes opened this issue Mar 16, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Either implement static port mapping or implement dynamic capabilites #5809

cwgoes opened this issue Mar 16, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor

cwgoes commented Mar 16, 2020

Apparently we assume that ModuleName == PortName in MsgPacket, this is just wrong.

Either we need a static routing table mapping port names to module names or we need to wait for ADR 3 (dynamic capabilities) to be implemented.

cc @AdityaSripal any thoughts here?

@cwgoes cwgoes added the x/ibc label Mar 16, 2020
@cwgoes cwgoes added this to the IBC Implementation milestone Mar 17, 2020
@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Mar 17, 2020

@alexanderbez Are you interested in working on this 🙏 ?

@cwgoes
Copy link
Contributor Author

cwgoes commented Mar 17, 2020

Closing in favour of #5542.

@cwgoes cwgoes closed this as completed Mar 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants