-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 124
Mark polyfill as deprecated #17
Comments
Opera 33 is now stable. Let’s do this? |
Agreed. Will do this when I get a moment. |
Is this truly deprecated and no longer useful? |
Yes. Chrome stable now supports addAll On Sat, 21 Nov 2015, 07:14 Nathan Walker [email protected] wrote:
|
This has been deprecated, see dominiccooney/cache-polyfill#17 Closes #22
@jakearchibald: should the entry at https://jakearchibald.github.io/isserviceworkerready/ be updated as well? |
Yeah, I'll try and get these updated tomorrow, keep getting distracted. On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, 19:33 Dan Dascalescu [email protected] wrote:
|
Mark polyfill as obsolete. Fix #17.
Did this polyfill work for Safari and IE as well? We're hunting for a polyfill to use for those browsers. |
There's an IDB version in the history of this project, but it still On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, 08:54 Andrew Stoker [email protected] wrote:
|
What was that branch name? There appear to be a few branches. This is something that would be fantastic for our company, but we need to support Safari and IE as well as Chrome and Firefox. |
This actually sounds interesting. Chrome now supports 98% of ES2015, so, should all es6 transpilers be deprecated once it reaches 100%? I see in the logs that people are using Chrome 40 everyday, so it's a wrong assumption that once fixed version is release--polyfill isn't needed anymore. |
This has been deprecated, see dominiccooney/cache-polyfill#17 Closes #22
This has been deprecated, see dominiccooney/cache-polyfill#17 Closes #22
As soon as Chrome 46 (check) and Opera 33 (
soonnow) are out, this polyfill isn’t needed anymore. \o/The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: