Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Name servers after their pods #596

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2016
Merged

Conversation

errm
Copy link
Contributor

@errm errm commented Aug 4, 2016

The TargetRef contains information from the object referenced
by the pod, unless the service has been set up with bare
endpoints - i.e. not pointing at pods this information
will be present.

It just makes the information that we show in the web-ui
a little more constent with that shown in kubectl
and the kuberntes dashboard.

@errm
Copy link
Contributor Author

errm commented Aug 4, 2016

ping @containous/traefik

@emilevauge
Copy link
Member

LGTM :)

@vdemeester
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM 🐱 but I feel this whole method needs some refactoring to be more readable

@errm
Copy link
Contributor Author

errm commented Aug 6, 2016

@vdemeester I agree.

I have some plans to do some fairly extensive refactoring of this provider, as in its current form stuff is quite hard to test, and to grock, so I would rather keep this change smaller, and clean stuff up later.

The TargetRef contains information from the object referenced
by the pod, unless the service has been set up with bare
endpoints - i.e. not pointing at pods this information
will be present.

It just makes the information that we show in the web-ui
a little more constent with that shown in kubectl
and the kuberntes dashboard.
@vdemeester vdemeester merged commit e2c4872 into traefik:master Aug 7, 2016
@errm errm deleted the k8s-server-naming branch September 28, 2017 15:29
@ldez ldez changed the title Name servers after thier pods Name servers after their pods Nov 9, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants