Replies: 1 comment
-
Yes the bind call should happen before the fork in aardvark-dns so that the error can be reported properly. That is definitely on the TODO list |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
In rootfull podman using the
netadvark
backend:Inside the container, DNS seems to be setup:
...but no query actually succeeds. A transient systemd unit is created which I assume should do DNS resolution, and it's actually listed as "running", but the logs say otherwise:
I'm not sure if the fact that aardvark fails is a bug -- it's probably my mistake, the "Address already in use" message is probably because I'm running a DNS server on the host so port 53 is already taken (see containers/aardvark-dns#13 for more discussion).
On the other hand, a nice feature for
podman
should be to report any errors from its subcomponents without having to dig up an obscure systemd unit. What do you think?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions