-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 788
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Respect registries.conf
search list for image pulls
#1316
Comments
Tom can you check this and make it work the same way podman pull works? @vrothberg @mtrmac Is this something that is being moved into container/image? |
c/image won’t natively implement the signature-breaking search in the FWIW I’ve managed to convince OpenShift to give up on search ( openshift/builder#40 openshift/api#192 ) as it has never worked as expected with authentication, so I’m not sure how urgent this is for buildah. Still, it’s very reasonable to expect that |
Thanks so much 🙏 I would very much like to deprecate the search registries as they actually serve as mirrorr/pull endpoints for docker.io. Expanding an unqualified image (e.g., |
That’s not quite how we think of them; projectatomic/docker has diverged from upstream (e.g. in projectatomic/docker@8193836 ) to define (hostname-)“qualified”/“unqualified” names; unqualified mean “use the search list”, but that’s not the same thing as treating the search list as mirrors — notably
Right, there is a spec for how to pull from a registry, but not for what the docker CLI arguments mean. The Ideally, I’d like to have aliases instead of search ( |
This is fixed in master branch. |
buildah pull
currently does not consult theregistries.conf
search list when doing an image pull. It instead uses "docker-centric" logic to pull fromdocker.io
if no repository is specified in an image pull spec.This can cause builds to break if
docker.io
is not in theregistries.conf
search path. See report in containers/image#572.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: