Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC: EIP-1559 vs EIP-3416 impact on Client Apps/Wallets #33

Open
ghost opened this issue Apr 14, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

RFC: EIP-1559 vs EIP-3416 impact on Client Apps/Wallets #33

ghost opened this issue Apr 14, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 14, 2021

Dear Rosetta-Ethereum client devs, we are looking forward to improving the Market Fee on Ethereum blockchain. We are a couple of engineers proposing an EIP improvement based on EIP-1559. We estimate 1559 is great but we propose an improvement to:

  • further reduce the gas price volatility with a median function (on premium gas price on top of base fees);
  • reduce base fees volatility with an additive function (linear dynamic) instead of multiplicative (ie. exponential dynamic);
  • reduce the footprint of the changes on wallets and clients by maintaining the same tx format and UI.

I know you have probably expressed your opinion before but we will appreciate if you can leave a Support +1 , NotSupport -1, or NeedMoreInfo opinion or comments on the forums from client/wallet apps before the AllCoreDevs meeting this Friday:

Proposal:
https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3416.md
EIP-33416 proposal for London fork:
ethereum/pm#294
Discord (Fee Market):
https://discord.com/channels/595666850260713488/749160974506000444

UI Comparison Diagram:
image
Best,
HexZorro
image

@ghost ghost added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants