You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear Rosetta-Ethereum client devs, we are looking forward to improving the Market Fee on Ethereum blockchain. We are a couple of engineers proposing an EIP improvement based on EIP-1559. We estimate 1559 is great but we propose an improvement to:
further reduce the gas price volatility with a median function (on premium gas price on top of base fees);
reduce base fees volatility with an additive function (linear dynamic) instead of multiplicative (ie. exponential dynamic);
reduce the footprint of the changes on wallets and clients by maintaining the same tx format and UI.
I know you have probably expressed your opinion before but we will appreciate if you can leave a Support +1 , NotSupport -1, or NeedMoreInfo opinion or comments on the forums from client/wallet apps before the AllCoreDevs meeting this Friday:
Dear Rosetta-Ethereum client devs, we are looking forward to improving the Market Fee on Ethereum blockchain. We are a couple of engineers proposing an EIP improvement based on EIP-1559. We estimate 1559 is great but we propose an improvement to:
I know you have probably expressed your opinion before but we will appreciate if you can leave a Support +1 , NotSupport -1, or NeedMoreInfo opinion or comments on the forums from client/wallet apps before the AllCoreDevs meeting this Friday:
Proposal:
https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-3416.md
EIP-33416 proposal for London fork:
ethereum/pm#294
Discord (Fee Market):
https://discord.com/channels/595666850260713488/749160974506000444
UI Comparison Diagram:
Best,
HexZorro
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: