Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update deps and add 1.6 elixir version to travis #356

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 23, 2018

Conversation

snewcomer
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 20, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 80.402% when pulling bff8409 on snewcomer:sn/update-deps into 464687e on code-corps:2.0-beta.

@snewcomer snewcomer changed the title update deps and elixir version update deps and add 1.6 elixir version Apr 21, 2018
Copy link
Contributor

@begedin begedin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 If you want to explictly update elixir, we're ok with that to.

@begedin begedin merged commit eb43513 into beam-community:2.0-beta Apr 23, 2018
@begedin begedin changed the title update deps and add 1.6 elixir version update deps and add 1.6 elixir version to travis Apr 23, 2018
@greysteil
Copy link

Would you be up for automatically keeping the dependencies up-to-date? I built Dependabot for that and it's totally free for open source.

@snewcomer snewcomer deleted the sn/update-deps branch April 26, 2018 15:06
@begedin
Copy link
Contributor

begedin commented Apr 30, 2018

@greysteil We use greenkeeper in our JS projects and it seems to work well, so we would be interested. It would be up for discussion, though, since at the moment, we're maintaining 3 different branches, so keeping up with the PRs would be difficult. If you're willing to create an issue with some links/documentation and maybe a proposal on dealing with 3 branches, we would love to start a discussion.

@greysteil
Copy link

Awesome - will do!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants