Is it acceptable for features SSTable partitioner and compaction filter

[hicqu]

I'm working with pebble in my project now and thank you for this wonderful library. I want to introduce 2 RocksDB things into pebble:

• SSTablePartitioner, to seperate SST files with custom boundaries
• CompactionFilter, to custom compactions

I'm not sure whether they conflict with other things you are working on. I hope they are acceptable and I can give a try if so.

Jira issue: PEBBLE-95

[jbowens]

Hi @hicqu, great to hear you're using and enjoying Pebble! We would welcome both of those extensions. If you want to take these on, I suggest sketching out an implementation design in this issue first, and we can discuss.

I'm not sure whether they conflict with other things you are working on.

The one thing that comes to mind is ranged keys (design in #1341). That project doesn't fundamentally conflict, but we'll be integrating these "ranged keys" into compactions in the next few weeks. There is some potential for conflicts as we consider refactors of the compaction logic to fit range keys.

[hicqu]

@jbowens thanks for your information. I will try to send a RFC PR later.

[aierui]

ping @hicqu

[gawen]

ping @hicqu . interested in the compaction filter!