Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

workload/schemachange: avoid commmenting on transient check constraints #128833

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 12, 2024

Conversation

rafiss
Copy link
Collaborator

@rafiss rafiss commented Aug 12, 2024

These check constraints are added temporarily while adding a non-nullable column. We have seen flakes caused by the workload trying to refer to them.

informs #128615
Release note: None

@rafiss rafiss requested review from annrpom and a team August 12, 2024 18:37
@rafiss rafiss requested a review from a team as a code owner August 12, 2024 18:37
@rafiss rafiss requested review from DarrylWong and renatolabs and removed request for a team August 12, 2024 18:37
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Contributor

@annrpom annrpom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

edit: i didn't realize that commenting :lgtm: puts the stamp -- neat

These check constraints are added temporarily while adding a
non-nullable column. We have seen flakes caused by the workload trying
to refer to them.

Release note: None
@rafiss rafiss force-pushed the fix-rsw-transient-constraint branch from 5fe7cb6 to aff5d21 Compare August 12, 2024 20:54
@rafiss
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rafiss commented Aug 12, 2024

tftr!

bors r+

@craig craig bot merged commit 6bae06f into cockroachdb:master Aug 12, 2024
21 of 23 checks passed
@rafiss rafiss deleted the fix-rsw-transient-constraint branch August 14, 2024 22:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants