Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating particle ids for lambdas #15

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 12, 2020
Merged

Conversation

alberto-sanchez
Copy link
Contributor

Making lambda's ids compatible with pythia 8.3

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @alberto-sanchez (Alberto Sanchez Hernandez) for branch master.

@SiewYan, @smuzaffar, @mkirsano, @mrodozov, @cmsbuild, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @agrohsje, @alberto-sanchez can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mkirsano this is something you requested to watch as well.
cms-bot commands are listed here

@alberto-sanchez
Copy link
Contributor Author

alberto-sanchez commented Oct 15, 2020

This should fix the issue in cms-sw/cmsdist#6286 with the update of pythia to 8.3

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 15, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Tested with other pull request(s) cms-sw/cmsdist#6286

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: b352975

CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-10-15-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820
You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7fb10d/9983/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: UnitTests

  • Unit Tests:

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test GeneratorInterfaceEvtGenInterfaceTest had ERRORS
---> test testTauEmbeddingProducers had ERRORS

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7fb10d/9983/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 43340 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2541536
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 472751
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 172
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2068591
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -1109.497 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10224.0 ): 0.625 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): -555.274 KiB HLT/HLTEgammaValidation
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 250202.181 ): 0.543 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 25202.0 ): -0.117 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 16, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Tested with other pull request(s) cms-sw/cmsdist#6286,cms-sw/cmssw#31816

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: b352975

CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-10-15-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

  • #31772 @jalimena: fix for displaced susy relval production (TRK and EXO validation of displaced tracks)
  • #31792 @Dr15Jones: Removed use of boost::any in edmNew::DetSetVector
  • #31804 @ianna: [DD] remove unused headers
  • #31774 @bsunanda: Phase2-hgx264x Correct a small issue in HGCalGeometry and update some test codes

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bfcce0/10003/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bfcce0/10003/git-merge-result

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bfcce0/10003/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: UnitTests

  • Unit Tests:

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test GeneratorInterfaceEvtGenInterfaceTest had ERRORS
---> test testTauEmbeddingProducers had ERRORS

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

  • #31772 @jalimena: fix for displaced susy relval production (TRK and EXO validation of displaced tracks)
  • #31792 @Dr15Jones: Removed use of boost::any in edmNew::DetSetVector
  • #31804 @ianna: [DD] remove unused headers
  • #31774 @bsunanda: Phase2-hgx264x Correct a small issue in HGCalGeometry and update some test codes

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bfcce0/10003/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bfcce0/10003/git-merge-result

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 4, 2020

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-bfcce0/10478/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 43244 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2541876
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 474859
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 172
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2066823
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -1109.497 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10224.0 ): 0.625 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): -555.274 KiB HLT/HLTEgammaValidation
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 250202.181 ): 0.543 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 25202.0 ): -0.117 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 10, 2020

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Tested with other pull request(s) cms-sw/cmsdist#6286,cms-sw/cmssw#31816,cms-sw/cmssw#32077

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1
Tested at: 206c0d9
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-44598f/10612/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-11-09-2300
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-44598f/10612/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 43268 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2527080
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 476269
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 172
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2050617
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: -1109.497 KiB( 34 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10224.0 ): 0.625 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 11634.0,... ): -555.274 KiB HLT/HLTEgammaValidation
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 250202.181 ): 0.543 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 25202.0 ): -0.117 KiB SiStrip/MechanicalView
  • Checked 148 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

So, are we happy with this update? If yes then can you please sign so that we can merge and create a cmsdist PR to go with cms-sw/cmsdist#6286

@agrohsje
Copy link

+1

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

+externals

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants