diff --git a/docs/ipv6.md b/docs/ipv6.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e5d9eb2cbf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/ipv6.md
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+# Ipv6 support in kube-router
+
+This document describes the current status, the plan ahead and general
+thoughts about ipv6 support in `kube-router`.
+
+Ipv6-only is supported (in alpha) in `Kubernetes` from version 1.9 and
+support for ipv4/ipv6 dual stack is on the way
+([KEP](https://github.com/leblancd/community/blob/dual-stack-kep/keps/sig-network/0013-20180612-ipv4-ipv6-dual-stack.md)). It
+is desirable for `kube-router` to keep up with that development.
+
+The idea is to implement ipv6-only function-by-function;
+
+ * CNI `--enable-cni`
+ * Proxy `--run-service-proxy`
+ * Router `--run-router`
+ * Network policies `--run-firewall`
+
+It is important to always keep dual-stack in mind. The code must not
+be altered to handle ipv6 instead of ipv4 but must be able to handle
+both at the same time in the near future.
+
+To use ipv6 is usually not so hard in golang. The same code is used,
+only the addresses differ. This is also true for `iptables` and
+`ipvsadm`. This makes support for ipv6 a bit easier to implement.
+
+## Testing
+
+Test and development has so far used
+https://github.com/Nordix/xcluster/tree/master/ovl/kube-router-ipv6
+which is an easy way to get a ipv6-only Kubernetes cluster.
+
+To setup an ipv6-only Kubernetes cluster is usually no simple task,
+see for instance https://github.com/leblancd/kube-v6
+
+No automatic tests exist yet for ipv6.
+
+
+## Current status (Thu Oct 11 2018)
+
+Support for ipv6 in the the CNI function in `kube-router` is under
+development. The local BGP routers peers with ipv6;
+
+```
+# gobgp neighbor
+Peer                AS  Up/Down State       |#Received  Accepted
+1000::1:c0a8:101 64512 00:00:37 Establ      |        0         0
+1000::1:c0a8:102 64512 00:00:37 Establ      |        0         0
+1000::1:c0a8:103 64512 00:00:40 Establ      |        0         0
+```
+
+The CNI configuration is also updated with ipv6 addresses;
+
+```
+# jq . < /etc/cni/net.d/10-kuberouter.conf  | cat
+{
+  "bridge": "kube-bridge",
+  "ipam": {
+    "subnet": "1000::2:b00:100/120",
+    "type": "host-local"
+  },
+  "isDefaultGateway": true,
+  "isGateway": true,
+  "name": "ekvm",
+  "type": "bridge"
+}
+```
+
+This means that pod's gets assigned ipv6 addresses.
+
+The announcement of the pod CIDRs does not work yet. So pods on other
+nodes than the own can not be reached.
+
+To get this working the routes must be inserted in the RIB for
+`gobgp`. Checking the ipv4 rib gives an error;
+
+```
+# gobgp -a ipv4 global rib
+invalid nexthop address: <nil>
+```
+
+While the ipv6 rib is empty;
+
+```
+# gobgp -a ipv6 global rib
+Network not in table
+```
+
+A guess is that `kube-router` tries to insert ipv6 addresses in the
+ipv4 rib.
+
+When the bgp announcement of ipv6 cidr for pods work the support for
+ipv6 in the `kube-router` CNI is done (I hope).
+
+
+## Roadmap
+
+There is no time-plan. Help is welcome.
+
+After the CNI the next function in line may be the service
+proxy. `ipvs` has full support for ipv6. The dual-stack KEP states
+that to get dual stack support for a service two services must be
+specified, one for ipv4 and another for ipv6. The implementation
+should get the protocol from a global setting for ipv6-only and later
+from some attribute in the service object.
+
+Since the same `gobgp` is used for the CNI and the router functions is
+may be fairly simple to implement ipv6 support.
+
+Ipv6 support for the firewall function is not investigated. Ipv6 support
+for `ipset` is implemented already for the CNI.
+
+
+
+