Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tst-sigaltstack.so fails on aarch64 #1151

Closed
wkozaczuk opened this issue Jun 27, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

tst-sigaltstack.so fails on aarch64 #1151

wkozaczuk opened this issue Jun 27, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@wkozaczuk
Copy link
Collaborator

wkozaczuk commented Jun 27, 2021

OSv v0.55.0-292-g6dec325e
eth0: 192.168.122.15
Booted up in 85.72 ms
Cmdline: /tests/tst-sigaltstack.so
Assertion failed: !(ef->spsr & processor::daif_i) (arch/aarch64/mmu.cc: page_fault: 47)

[backtrace]
0x00000000400e8f70 <__assert_fail+32>
0x000000004020baf0 <page_fault+188>
0x000000004020b828 <???+1075886120>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
0x000010000002128c <???+135820>
...

I think that mainly it fails due to the lack of signals support on aarch64 (see #1154) but there may also be caused by the lack of the "dedicated stack" support.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant