Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flesh out the JSON output #31

Open
JonZeolla opened this issue Mar 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Flesh out the JSON output #31

JonZeolla opened this issue Mar 22, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@JonZeolla
Copy link
Member

Looks like we need to fill out - some examples below, but look at the JSON schema (good example here):

"published": Datetime
"revisions": [Github URI]
"document_ids": CNSWPv1
"links": ["link to the white paper"]
"roles": null,
"locations": Insert website (github repo?)
"parties": null,
"responsible_parties": null,
"remarks": null

@brandtkeller
Copy link
Collaborator

Running the output against a json schema validator using the oscal schema for a specified version would be a good practice. Also would shine a light on some areas where the current artifact is not a valid OSCAL catalog as of yet.

Lula and the Lula-action could be used to ensure linting in pipelines with something like lula tools lint -f controls-catalog.json as a quality gate. Lula will run a schema validation on all version >= 1.0.4

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants