Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ProtoREPL is no longer maintained; Tools / Atom should mention Chlorine instead #352

Open
seancorfield opened this issue Aug 5, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@seancorfield
Copy link
Member

ProtoREPL hasn't been updated in over two years and I've seen several people report that ProtoREPL doesn't work properly with recent versions of Atom -- and specifically that the instructions on the Tools / Atom page don't work anymore.

This page https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript-site/blob/master/content/tools/atom.adoc should be updated to use https://github.com/mauricioszabo/atom-chlorine

Maybe @mauricioszabo can provide updated instructions for using Chlorine for ClojureScript for this page? Or perhaps this page should just point to the Chlorine package docs?

@swannodette
Copy link
Member

Happy to take a PR to clean this up since I really don't know that much about it.

@mauricioszabo
Copy link

Well, currently Chlorine will not work with Fighwheel, only Shadow-CLJS. I'll do a PR on how to use it with Shadow-CLJS and keep the info with Fighweel to Proto-REPL.

Then, as soon as Chlorine supports Figwheel, I'll update this document :)

@seancorfield
Copy link
Member Author

@mauricioszabo At this point, even an Atom page is moot, right? Is Pulsar/Chlorine a viable option at this point, or would it be better for the ClojureScript site just to remove the atom.adoc page (and any links to it)?

@mauricioszabo
Copy link

Pulsar with Chlorine is a viable option - Pulsar is basically Atom with a newer Electron version. Parinfer, Paredit, and Chlorine all work flawlessly too - I've been using it daily, and haven't found any issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants