You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I ran three readings with varying MTreg values (31, default, 200).
Across a range of light levels (in the 100-500 lux range), the lux value computed for MTreg=200 was wildly different to the other cases.
This makes me suspect that there is a bug, probably involving incorrect data types and/or integer division. This could be in the calculation of the time interval (this is tentatively confirmed by injecting my own time delay).
[version 1.3.0 used on ESP8266 arduino platform]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I ran three readings with varying MTreg values (31, default, 200).
Across a range of light levels (in the 100-500 lux range), the lux value computed for MTreg=200 was wildly different to the other cases.
This makes me suspect that there is a bug, probably involving incorrect data types and/or integer division. This could be in the calculation of the time interval (this is tentatively confirmed by injecting my own time delay).
[version 1.3.0 used on ESP8266 arduino platform]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: