-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Binding ServiceGroup to multiple VirtualServers #5
Comments
What would you suggest? Should the |
Yes that would work for us. But was hoping the change would also consume only a single http connection. As it is now when we have 130+ VIPs to bind to, an equal number of service groups are created which cause some calls to fail intermittently as the max number of Netscaler connections are reached. |
Being able to bind a single servicegroup resource to multiple vservers would also be very useful for us. |
Also being able to bind a service to multiple vservers would be useful, but servicegroups should suffice in the short term. |
See if this works: https://github.com/citrix/terraform-provider-netscaler/releases/tag/v0.96-alpha.2 For reducing the number of connections, we already re-use a global http.Client in the go code, which by default re-uses connections. Perhaps try and reduce the parallelism of TF |
Multiple vservers appears to be working on my test server. Thanks for the quick turnaround! |
@paultravers @sjwl comments on issue #6 |
@chiradeep Multiple vservers appear to be working on our end too. Thank you very much! |
This currently doesn't seem possible.
Binding a single
netscaler_servicegroup
to multiplenetscaler_lbverver
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: