-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OpenStack support #210
Comments
Will put it in the list for discussions for Q2. Did I understand it correctly that Zun (Containers Service) can't at the moment run a group of containers like pods in Kubernetes? Would be pretty nice for mapping Additional Containers feature. |
I'm not sure if the Cirrus CI code is open source, if it is, be happy to contribute to help get that done. Zun is currently not that widely deployed, there's also challenges around it's multi-tenancy model at the moment. However, Magnum is actually a service which is the equivalent of GKE, so you can launch a Kubernetes cluster on-top of OpenStack and consume it |
Got it! Sounds like a perfect match. Cirrus CI is not yet open sourced so it's on our side to implement it. 😅Recent AWS-related work showed that the most time is spend on supporting storage for logs and caches. Do you have someone specific in mind who is looking for a new CI and will immediately benefit from Cirrus? Just want to sense the importance of it. Might be able to put it right after current |
@fkorotkov no worries. I don't really have anyone I can publicly say, but I know we have a few customers that use Travis CI which have been looking for alternatives since the recent layoffs. |
@mnaser we are looking into starting working on the OpenStack integration and have a few very basic questions. I will appreciate if you can answer them. Do people have OpenStack API endpoints publicly available. I guess the answer is no and people have their OpenStacks under a VPC (with VEXXHOST's offering it seems customers get publicly available endpoint though). Cirrus doesn't have Enterprise (self-hosted) offering at the moment so in this case a an easy VPC to Cirrus connectivity solution remains to be found. 🤔Do people in general tend to host everything including GitHub Enterprise on their OpenStack's? |
Hi @fkorotkov The OpenStack API endpoints could be publicly available (or could not be). This is a deployment decision. In our case, both our public clouds and private clouds do have public endpoints, so Cirrus will have the ability to talk to the APIs directly to provision servers. The trick is how you actually execute work under those VMs. In our environments, we can give you a public IP address directly on your server and that makes communication easy. However, if the agent listens for incoming connections and the deployment doesn't have that much public IPs, that might be problematic. However, if the agent connects out to get work, then it shouldn't be a problem and you can run it in what is the equivalent of a VPC. I'd be happy to provide access to our public cloud as a developer account in order to help land the OpenStack integration. :) |
Cirrus agents use unidirectional communication so there is no need to have access to the agents, agents need to be able to access grpc.cirrus-ci.com. So this is great news! Will put OpenStack Support to the next week's sprint. 🙌 |
@fkorotkov -- not holding you to any deadlines but just wondering how that's going? :) |
Not much of updates on our side. Did some preparational work and then got distracted by some urgent performance improvements for Cirrus infrastructure. Will keep you posted! |
There are too many improvements planned for the current stack. Removing |
@fkorotkov it's been a while but would be nice to get some updates on this! :) |
Description
We've love to integrate Cirrus CI with OpenStack as a supported computing service. We'd be more than happy to provide the resources to develop against
Context
Users who use an OpenStack public cloud or have their own private cloud that they'd like to use Cirrus CI on would need this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: