Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Candy support for Angular 2 - currently it's empty! #78

Closed
grantsheer opened this issue Feb 23, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Candy support for Angular 2 - currently it's empty! #78

grantsheer opened this issue Feb 23, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@grantsheer
Copy link

Hi There

Are you going to have support for annotations in TypeScript of the @Component variety in Angular 2 here? If not what do you suggest we do to support its constructs for building Angular 2 MVC apps; and if so, when do you think that it will be available?

Also, I notice that Angular 2 is in your candy repo, but when I declare it as a dependency in my POM, the API packages are not there; and the 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT version is newer than 2.0.1/2-SNAPSHOT(!):
angular2packages

I notice that it is not in the DefinitelyTyped repo, but moved a little while ago to the npm repo here.

Are you planning on importing it. If not, how would you suggest we use it (perhaps in the meantime), until it is correctly in your candy repo?

Thanks so much for an amazing project!

@renaudpawlak
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! For Angular 2, we need first to have support for annotations (they are called decorators in TypeScript). This is planned issue #43. I don't really understand why it is published as an empty candy, but it is clearly not usable before we have annotations anyway.

For candy versions, we need to clean the repo because versions x.y.1 and x.y.2 are obsolete. You should use the exact same version as they appear in the TSD repo, i.e. x.y.0 most of the time. (0.0.0 means latest).

Thanks for your nice words about JSweet :)

@grantsheer
Copy link
Author

Top stuff. Much appreciate your speedy reply.

Take care.

@kito99
Copy link

kito99 commented Sep 5, 2016

Shouldn't we lave the this open? The candy is still empty...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants