You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Can you give an update to split rewards by catching mobs?
So. Any player asked me, why only one player can have rewards by killing mobs.
The idea is, to give players rewards if more players killing/catching a mob/boss.
It would be good if there is an option to split the rewards among the players fairly.
When the players were involved in a battle or more players killed a mob.
As an an example:
Three players have participated in a boss competition.
Player one has hit the mob five times and gets 1:5 or can pick up 1:5
Player two has hit the mob eight times and gets 1:8 or can pick up 1:8
Player three has hit the mob three times and gets 1:3 or can pick up 1:3
Player two made the killing blow and gets a bonus.
Hi, This is an interesting idea and I will defenitely work on adding split rewards in the future. However, I won't add commands and items because I believe there are already suitable plugins that add this and also I want to keep MoneyFromMobs true to its nature which is a plugin that only adds money drops to mobs
Hi.
Can you give an update to split rewards by catching mobs?
So. Any player asked me, why only one player can have rewards by killing mobs.
The idea is, to give players rewards if more players killing/catching a mob/boss.
It would be good if there is an option to split the rewards among the players fairly.
When the players were involved in a battle or more players killed a mob.
As an an example:
Three players have participated in a boss competition.
Player one has hit the mob five times and gets 1:5 or can pick up 1:5
Player two has hit the mob eight times and gets 1:8 or can pick up 1:8
Player three has hit the mob three times and gets 1:3 or can pick up 1:3
Player two made the killing blow and gets a bonus.
Maybe you can create this update on Spigot version 1.19.2
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: