We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There seem to be two ways of calculating FPS.
via the 'time' model of caffe with batch_size = 1: build/tools/caffe time -model=models/VGGNet/VOC0712/refinedet_vgg16_320x320/deploy.prototxt -gpu=0
build/tools/caffe time -model=models/VGGNet/VOC0712/refinedet_vgg16_320x320/deploy.prototxt -gpu=0
get the time interval and estimate the FPS. for example, got the following lines after I run examples/ssd/score_ssd_pascal.py:
I0713 20:50:25.756376 117599 net.cpp:684] Ignoring source layer mbox_loss I0713 20:51:32.472930 117599 solver.cpp:531] Test net output #0: detection_eval = 0.723217 I0713 20:51:32.473057 117599 solver.cpp:325] Optimization Done.
The total time spent on evaluating 4952 test images is about 67 seconds, and thus FPS = 4952 / 67 = 74.
Which method should be used to calculate FPS? Is there any other way?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think the dssd is largely memory inefficient, so I think the FPS should be very low.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
There seem to be two ways of calculating FPS.
via the 'time' model of caffe with batch_size = 1:
build/tools/caffe time -model=models/VGGNet/VOC0712/refinedet_vgg16_320x320/deploy.prototxt -gpu=0
get the time interval and estimate the FPS.
for example, got the following lines after I run examples/ssd/score_ssd_pascal.py:
The total time spent on evaluating 4952 test images is about 67 seconds, and thus FPS = 4952 / 67 = 74.
Which method should be used to calculate FPS? Is there any other way?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: