You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 24, 2021. It is now read-only.
being able to set +b *a!*@* after you've set +b *?a!*@* but not the reverse assumes that humans will always add bans in order of widening scope, whereas adding a subset ban of an active superset ban with the intent to later remove the superset and not the subset makes a lot of sense, and I am sure there are other examples
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
being able to set
+b *a!*@*
after you've set+b *?a!*@*
but not the reverse assumes that humans will always add bans in order of widening scope, whereas adding a subset ban of an active superset ban with the intent to later remove the superset and not the subset makes a lot of sense, and I am sure there are other examplesThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: