Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 24, 2021. It is now read-only.

ban lists preventing adding subsets of active supersets assumes human behaviour #339

Open
jesopo opened this issue Jun 26, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@jesopo
Copy link
Contributor

jesopo commented Jun 26, 2020

being able to set +b *a!*@* after you've set +b *?a!*@* but not the reverse assumes that humans will always add bans in order of widening scope, whereas adding a subset ban of an active superset ban with the intent to later remove the superset and not the subset makes a lot of sense, and I am sure there are other examples

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant