Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Switch sqlalchemy to use standard API instead of async #275

Open
lchen-2101 opened this issue Dec 23, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #276
Open

Switch sqlalchemy to use standard API instead of async #275

lchen-2101 opened this issue Dec 23, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #276
Assignees
@lchen-2101
Labels
backend backend development python Pull requests that update Python code

Comments

@lchen-2101
Copy link
Collaborator

Standard API has a lot more support and documentation readily available, and the code is cleaner than async variant. No performance advantage for async API either, so switch to easier to use standard API
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@lchen-2101 lchen-2101

Labels
backend backend development python Pull requests that update Python code
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
1 participant
@lchen-2101