Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CIP 26 - Historical validator pubkey precompile - Discussions #93

Closed
6 of 10 tasks
YazzyYaz opened this issue Nov 24, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed
6 of 10 tasks

CIP 26 - Historical validator pubkey precompile - Discussions #93

YazzyYaz opened this issue Nov 24, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
HF Required Ring 0 Changes that can cause consensus failure

Comments

@YazzyYaz
Copy link
Contributor

YazzyYaz commented Nov 24, 2020

Discussions on the original PR are here

Discussions for the CIP 26 proposals are here

Draft Implementation: link

Deployment Checklist

  • Specification
  • Implementation
    • celo-blockchain
  • Testing
    • Unit tests
    • Run the test suite of slashing contract (@mrsmkl)
  • Pre-deploy
    • Precompile Address assignment in Donut block
  • Verification
    • Run a test suite of the precompiles ( (@mrsmkl)
@prestwich prestwich changed the title Discussions for CIP 26 Precompile for getting BLS public key for a given validator in a historical block CIP 26 - Historical validator pubkey precompile - Discussions Dec 1, 2020
@prestwich prestwich added Ring 0 Changes that can cause consensus failure HF Required labels Dec 1, 2020
@mcortesi mcortesi self-assigned this Jan 5, 2021
@celo-org celo-org locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 21, 2023
@carterqw2 carterqw2 converted this issue into discussion #331 Mar 21, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
HF Required Ring 0 Changes that can cause consensus failure
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants