You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
LGTM! Consider refining the response structure validation.
The new getRealTimeRetroPGF6 function is well-structured and consistent with getRealTimeRetroPGF5. However, there's a potential issue in the response structure validation.
The condition !Array.isArray(data.data) is checked twice. The second check seems redundant and might be a copy-paste error. Consider updating the validation as follows:
This change ensures that data.data is an array and is not empty, which appears to be the intended validation.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
export const getRealTimeRetroPGF6 = async (): Promise<iRetroPGF6Project[]> => {
try {
const baseUrl =
process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production'
? process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_WORKER_API_BASE
: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_WORKER_API_DEV
if (!baseUrl) {
throw new Error('API base URL is not defined in environment variables.')
}
const apiUrl = baseUrl + '/api/retropgf6-live-data/retropgf6-live-data.json'
const response = await axios.get<WorkerResponseRound6>(apiUrl)
const data: WorkerResponseRound6 = response.data
if (
!Array.isArray(data.data) ||
data.data.length === 0
) {
throw new Error('Unexpected response structure')
}
return data.data
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error fetching data:', error)
throw error
}
}
LGTM! Consider refining the response structure validation.
The new
getRealTimeRetroPGF6
function is well-structured and consistent withgetRealTimeRetroPGF5
. However, there's a potential issue in the response structure validation.The condition
!Array.isArray(data.data)
is checked twice. The second check seems redundant and might be a copy-paste error. Consider updating the validation as follows:This change ensures that
data.data
is an array and is not empty, which appears to be the intended validation.📝 Committable suggestion
Originally posted by @coderabbitai[bot] in #46 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: