You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Consider creating a generic category handler function
Since multiple functions (handleApplicationCategoryRound6, handleProjectCategoryRound, handleCategoryRound4, etc.) share similar logic, you might benefit from creating a generic function to handle categories across different rounds.
By centralizing the category handling, you reduce redundancy and simplify future updates.
Also applies to: 125-187
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure type safety by defining category types
Currently, the category parameter is typed as string, which may lead to runtime errors if an unexpected value is passed. To enhance type safety, consider defining a TypeScript type or enum for the categories.
Example:
+type ApplicationCategoryRound6 =+ | 'Governance Leadership'+ | 'Governance Infra & Tooling'+ | 'Governance Analytics';-export function handleApplicationCategoryRound6(- category: string,+export function handleApplicationCategoryRound6(+ category: ApplicationCategoryRound6,
textSize: string
) {
// function body
}
This approach ensures that only valid categories are passed to the function.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor handleApplicationCategoryRound6 to eliminate code duplication
The handleApplicationCategoryRound6 function contains repetitive code for each category. To improve maintainability and scalability, consider refactoring the function to dynamically generate the JSX based on a mapping of categories to their corresponding styles.
Here's an example of how you could refactor the function:
‼️IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Consider creating a generic category handler function
Since multiple functions (
handleApplicationCategoryRound6
,handleProjectCategoryRound
,handleCategoryRound4
, etc.) share similar logic, you might benefit from creating a generic function to handle categories across different rounds.Here’s a conceptual example:
By centralizing the category handling, you reduce redundancy and simplify future updates.
Also applies to: 125-187
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure type safety by defining category types
Currently, the
category
parameter is typed asstring
, which may lead to runtime errors if an unexpected value is passed. To enhance type safety, consider defining a TypeScript type or enum for the categories.Example:
This approach ensures that only valid categories are passed to the function.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor
handleApplicationCategoryRound6
to eliminate code duplicationThe
handleApplicationCategoryRound6
function contains repetitive code for each category. To improve maintainability and scalability, consider refactoring the function to dynamically generate the JSX based on a mapping of categories to their corresponding styles.Here's an example of how you could refactor the function:
📝 Committable suggestion
Originally posted by @coderabbitai[bot] in #46 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: