Coachmark: Composibility review

[RichKummer]

As a follow-on from the first step, we're now going to start digging into making these components more flexible and composable.

• Search Slack channel to see if people ask questions for the component. Are there any themes or patterns?
  • #ibmproducts-pal
  • #ibmproducts-pal-dev (a dev related channel but see if any design issues pop up)
• Pair with dev: At this point, try and find time to chat with a developer about the component. Discuss how they view the component and if they see opportunities to make this more flexible. For Coachmark, a good resource would be Nandan, and also invite Jeff Longshore to chat as well for background.
• Briefly check out other design systems for similar components. Component.gallery is useful here. Google’s Material Design and others are also useful.
  • Is there something those are doing that IBM might learn from?
• Focus on ease of use in this step – how can we make this component more flexible and easier for adopters to use for what they need.
• Optional, but I find it useful to look at our Figma libraries to see how designers are using our components/patterns.
• Playback or write up your analysis of the component!