Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Three-party handoff/Level 3 RPC support #597

Open
1 of 5 tasks
Semisol opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 5 tasks

Three-party handoff/Level 3 RPC support #597

Semisol opened this issue Jan 6, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@Semisol
Copy link
Contributor

Semisol commented Jan 6, 2025

This issue is for tracking 3PH implementation status. This supersedes #160 as there have been significant changes to the 3PH protocol since that implementation.

Progress tracking

  • Rework of Network implementation, and updating schemas
  • Implementation of initial 3PH support
    • No embargoes
      • As a temporary solution, we may refuse to proceed with 3PH if we have outstanding promises.
      • This option can be disabled for testing purposes in certain environments, but E-order can be violated
    • No call result forwarding: This only handles capability transfers.
    • Updates to the test network to make it support 3PH, and test caases
  • 4+ party forwarding: If Network3PH.Forward allows it, Accept messages can be forwarded if there exists a longer chain of vats.
    • This should be done with the initial 3PH PR if possible.
  • Implementation of embargo support for 3PH
  • Three party call forwarding
    • This would be beneficial in less environments compared to 3PH.
    • New APIs will most likely be required and code rewrites.

Other considerations

  • We should consider offering a basic VatNetwork implementation that is stable, using hostnames as vat identifiers, and possibly with TLS.
  • Work to prevent possible DoS issues should be done, as some networks will be public
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant