Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using torchreid data loading, I have lower result #7

Open
SunTongtongtong opened this issue Apr 4, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Using torchreid data loading, I have lower result #7

SunTongtongtong opened this issue Apr 4, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@SunTongtongtong
Copy link

Hello,

The code is really clear and easy to read, thanks for sharing!

However, due to the dataset process is not based on the original version(the img name in meta.json is different at least) which makes it a bit hard to follow, I use different data loading processes implemented based on torchreid. And the result I achieve is lower than reported in the paper(around 10 percent on average). I just wonder if the data loading can result in the degradation of the performance.

Thanks for your reply,

@weimingwill
Copy link
Member

Hi @SunTongtongtong, maybe you can try running it with only one dataset first to check whether the performance match with "Local Training" in the paper.

@Aotle
Copy link

Aotle commented Mar 2, 2022

Hi, I am also having difficulties with data processing. I would be very grateful if you could share your data processing code.
Thanks for your reply,

@Huhongyi
Copy link

hello @SunTongtongtong ,I would like to ask you , How to deal with data set?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants