Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Baseline - Purposes - feedback #26

Closed
gmuratk opened this issue May 12, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Baseline - Purposes - feedback #26

gmuratk opened this issue May 12, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@gmuratk
Copy link
Collaborator

gmuratk commented May 12, 2023

Problem description
Suggested text edits on Baseline doc #13 Purposes section

Expected action

  1. We need to call out applicability of Purpose categories to 3rd party Apps. For example, “Automatic purpose” cannot be given to an App simply stating they need to be generating an invoice for their user. Thus, a consent in this case would still be required. An Operator on the other hand is the legal entity that collects such data and has the relationship with Subscriber may be eligible for such purpose without explicit consent.
  2. “Moreover, when it comes to granting consent, there are two types of the purposes:”  three categories and two type of purposes, may be the latter is really consent applicability type rather than purpose.

Additional context
n/a

@gmuratk gmuratk added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label May 12, 2023
@jpengar
Copy link
Collaborator

jpengar commented May 16, 2023

So what would be your suggestions for changes to this document section?

@gmuratk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gmuratk commented May 16, 2023

For 1, we can add a note to inform the reader "NOTE: Some categories may NOT be allowed for all 3rd party Apps. (i.e. Automatic Purpose)"

For 2, I suggest "A subscriber consent can be collected either for all identifiers of the subscriber, or just specific identifiers of the subscriber. These types are described as follows: " but open to suggestions.

@jpengar
Copy link
Collaborator

jpengar commented May 19, 2023

Fixed in #13 commit 4b76135
@gmuratk Please take a look.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants