Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integration to on device application (EAP-AKA) - ICM 3.0 Scope? #198

Closed
bigludo7 opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

Integration to on device application (EAP-AKA) - ICM 3.0 Scope? #198

bigludo7 opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@bigludo7
Copy link
Collaborator

bigludo7 commented Sep 5, 2024

Problem description
Comment raised during Number Verification meeting today (not only myself :) )

We have the following issue camaraproject/NumberVerification#86 on Integration to on device application (EAP-AKA) opened for a long time.

We are wondering if this topic in general, and, precisely the impact on CAMARA flow(s) should be followed in ICM in the scope of ICM3.0.

Possible evolution

Alternative solution

Additional context

@bigludo7 bigludo7 added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 5, 2024
@shilpa-padgaonkar
Copy link
Collaborator

Related to #145

@bigludo7
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bigludo7 commented Sep 6, 2024

Related to #145

Thanks @shilpa-padgaonkar
I missed this one ... but my question stays: Should ve add#145 in #193 ?

@jpengar
Copy link
Collaborator

jpengar commented Sep 6, 2024

Thanks Shilpa, this is exactly what I wanted to point out, this issue is related to #145 and #94. @bigludo7 if you (or Number Verification WG) want to consider this as a candidate for sprint25 (r0.3.0), you can suggest it in #193.

BTW, if #145 is enough, I would suggest not to have more than one issue for the same topic, or to have parallel discussions in more than one issue.

@bigludo7
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks @shilpa-padgaonkar @jpengar
I'm happy now that #145 is part of #193.
I close my issue.
Thanks for the clarification.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants