-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error Model aligment with Commonalities Meta-Release Fall24 #154
Comments
Please find attached error model aligment porposal to discuss today (based on Commonalities Aligment PR#213) |
Hello @PedroDiez Only one comment :
|
Understood @bigludo7, makes sense to use 422, also being compliant with the guidelines. For the rest of the proposal, I guess you seems right, doesn't? |
Yes the rest of the proposal is fine for me :) |
Will wait EOD this Thursday to check other comments and moving forward with the updates |
Already covered in #152 |
Problem description
In the Context of Commonalities/Issue 180 and Commonalities/Issue 127. An error model alingment is required.
@bigludo7 also commented in 17th April meeting that could make sense to have some errors being addressed with 422 exception instead of 403 one.
Based on that aligment, it would be required to make proper adaptations in both carrier billing payment and carrier billing refund functionality.
Possible evolution
Pending to be proposed
Alternative solution
N/A
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: