Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature(renderer): Support reversed lists #668

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 29, 2020

Conversation

gdamore
Copy link
Collaborator

@gdamore gdamore commented Jun 29, 2020

While testing, found some more potential edge cases around
the parser for attributes lists, so tightened those up.

Fixes #662

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 29, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #668 into master will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #668   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.65%   85.66%           
=======================================
  Files          71       71           
  Lines        4713     4715    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         4037     4039    +2     
  Misses        422      422           
  Partials      254      254           

@xcoulon
Copy link
Member

xcoulon commented Jun 29, 2020

@gdamore looks good but there is a couple of formatting issues reported by the linter

While testing, found some more potential edge cases around
the parser for attributes lists, so tightened those up.

Fixes bytesparadise#662
@gdamore
Copy link
Collaborator Author

gdamore commented Jun 29, 2020

was extra lines (whitespace) in the test file. (My editor stopped formatting on save for some reason...)

Fixed and squashed. Should be ready to go.

@xcoulon
Copy link
Member

xcoulon commented Jun 29, 2020

was extra lines (whitespace) in the test file. (My editor stopped formatting on save for some reason...)

Fixed and squashed. Should be ready to go.

thanks!

@xcoulon xcoulon merged commit b323d2f into bytesparadise:master Jun 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ordered lists should support %reversed option
2 participants